Brook is still a step up I wouldn't pick anyone on GGG's resume to beat him!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by james5000, Jul 8, 2016.


  1. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,524
    3,634
    Apr 11, 2010
    Kell Brook is at least the no.1 welterweight on the planet?
    Historically the no.1 @ welterweight has always been a decent middleweight?

    Who would you pick to beat him CST?
     
  2. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    I disagree about Brook being the number1 WW. I think it is Thurman who's number 1 in the division.
     
  3. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Brook beat an undefeated Porter, and clearer than Thurman did.
     
  4. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    Thurman has the better resume.
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,023
    15,691
    Jul 25, 2014
    Golovkin is a coward.
     
  6. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Clear win over undefeated Porter> Thurmans entire career :deal
     
  7. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    7-5 slug fest win over Porter>>>>> Brooks 8-4 Hug fest of Porter!:deal
     
  8. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,810
    8,275
    Feb 14, 2014
    Why? Whom should he fight at 160? :huh
     
  9. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,524
    3,634
    Apr 11, 2010
    Porter bullied him at times, Kell Brook would do worse to him.

    Spence might take his throne one day, but he's not there yet.
     
  10. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Since when does hugging diminish a win? Only if you're a Pac****.
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    Brook holds, Thurman fights!
     
  12. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    It was like watching an episode of Barney handing out free hugs!
     
  13. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,023
    15,691
    Jul 25, 2014
    Little G has fought at 160 for over a decade. The guy fought at 165 in the amateurs. Prove yourself and move up to 168. There will always be detractors, but no matter what at the end of the day if you're in this for any kind of legacy at all, you move up in weight when your weight class is the most pathetically weak divisions today. We get it boxing is a business, but if you and your team make promises like 154-175, at least try and live up to it a LITTLE bit.
     
  14. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    So does holding diminish any win?
     
  15. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    74,897
    39,247
    Jan 22, 2015
    No. But it was a very uneventful fight and was plagued by the excessive holding. At least Thurman fought Porter in an exciting fight for the fans and still pulled it off. Brook didn't fight the beast that showed up for the Thurman fight.