Brook needs to vacate

No he doesn't. Why? Just so idiots can claim he ducked Spence because he hasn't been medically cleared?

Nothing stopping Spence from taking an interim fight in the meantime. Hasn't he also been offered a final eliminator v Bradley too with the WBC?

Brook hasn't been medically cleared to spar yet. The reason he hasn't vacated is because he has no problem whatsoever fighting Spence, if he can't land Pacquiao or Khan.

And if Brook holds his ground Spence won't take the fight anyway. His team are just waiting to see if Brook vacates- and Haymon is pushing Khan in that direction. Because if he doesn't, Spence ain't coming to the UK for 25% with VADA testing. Not happening.

So the one who will stop 'two of your favouite welters squaring off will be Spence- not Brook- if he doesn't vacate, which you indicate he should, just so Spence can fight Berto for a vacant title.

 

Bit harsh on Brook. Doctors have still not cleared him to spar. Let's give him an opportunity to actually train for the spence fight.

Kell will fight Spence as Khan doesn't want the fight. Eddie Hearn wants Kell to vacate and move up. Kell told him he isn't giving up his belt.

 

So a medical extension should be mitigated by the caliber of the opponent who caused it? I'd rather my doctor be objective in making his assessment and it's right the doctors who granted Brook's extension were too. Who caused an injury and the judiciousness of fighting him is irrelevant..

 

Spence should call out Khan, the winner fights Brook. Let's see Khan wriggle out of that one...

 

You should be calling on wilder to vacate before you ever complain about brook

 

He will take a fight with Bradley because if he wins, he can become mandatory for the WBC title (and thus also the WBA being they are unifying) and he can fight Bradley for 50% in the USA, rather than coming on a kanikaze mission to the UK in a fight he won't win.

It will have VADA testing because Brook has had it for all his recent fights, and Matchroom will win the purse bid.

And why shouldn't he go after GGG. Nobody else was willing to fight him, and his stock rose even in defeat. Spence, through Haymon, was offered the fight as a voluntary last summer but they wasn't keen (which is why I know they are only interested in the IBF if Brook vacates). Injuries happen in boxing. It's part of the game, and even if Brook was fit to make a defence, they would've likely waited until May anyway and done the deal before going to purse bids, being they already have Haye-Bellew, and Joshua-Klitschko PPVs. So why ask to be made champ in recess, when he can be given a medical exemption for a few extra weeks.

All that will happen if Brook vacates is Spence gets an easy fight for a vacant title. Why not try and prove himself instead?

 

hearn is hinting that he doesn't like the brook spence fight. he said he just lost v ggg and another loss against spence would leave him no where to go and that is so true because brook has been a cuddled and protected fighter. so it is too risky for hearn and brook. unless they get khan fight brook is running to 154. i called this long,long,long time ago my friends

 

And brook should be allowed have one or two tune up fights when he comes back from injury, before having her mandatory

 

Just like you called this: [url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/how-long-before-brook-pulls-out.569547/[/url]

And Porter beating him?

Do you ever get tired of him proving you wrong?

And the fact you think he's been protected when Arum and Haymon are steering their big stars well clear of him, just shows that you have become bitter by have an unwillingness to admit when you're wrong.

 

that was a tongue in cheek thread

if brook wants to fight the big names then come to usa... admitted to ducking bradley before he became champ, rios fight wasn't made, chavez fight, etc. hearn is smart