brook/spence ggg/jacobs canelo/chavez

The plan imo was to:

1. Collect Brooks biggest payday
2. Try to do the impossible and have a WW move up and Dethrone the hardest MW puncher.
3. If it seemed unlikely that Brook was going to win, pull the plug on the fight.

What happed:

1. Brook got his payday (got paid more than GGG)
2. I believe he truly attempted to win between rds 1-4
3. Stopped the fight as soon as the fight looked like it was going downhill for Brook.

 

Golovkin has been a pro 11 years, his resume is garbage. His records are second-hand store quality.
Spence has ONLY been a pro 4 years and is closing in on GGG in terms of quality opponents.

 

He's a smooth troll, notice how for GGG fight he asks if this is a real test but for Canelo fight if he will make money lmao
He should be asking if this is a REAL test for Canelo and the answer is no because this is a blatant cherrypick joke of a fight.

Like Canelo needs more money? He's been making truckload and this clown still worries about Canelo's finances

 

Probably.
He is darker than me too, but I'm better than him.
There are levels to this "darkness" thing.

 

I think all 3 are fairly interesting my opinion, Brook-Spence is a chance for both guys to prove they're the goods. Kell only has one real win and is just barley more tested than Spence. Spence has a chance to knock off one of the more hyped guys at 47 and win his first title a lot is at stake for both fighters, think Spence might stop him in a competitive bout.

GGG-Jacobs is on a similar level dispite his title's Golovkin has beaten no one of real quality, Jacobs isn't elite but is currently #2 in a bad division and is the best MW fight that can be made barring a Canelo fight. I think Golovkin wins due to a weak chin on Jacobs part but whoever lands and makes in impression 1st will tell a lot.

Canelo-Chavez while not as important towards the division is a fan friendly matchup, and if Chavez comes in determined should be a great one I think Alvarez wins a hard fought division or late body stoppage in a FOTY candidate.

 

Brook will be his only good opponent but apparently his resume is also cap so in the grand scheme of things Spence going by your logic shouldn't get any credit if he beats Brook because Brook has beaten no one as well.

Regarding GGG he has been ducked his whole career at 160, the ginger whinger has recently proved this as when Golovkin is mentioned he's a 154/155 fighter but suddenly can go to 165 for Chavez LOL....and you have the audacity to excuse him.

And before you start I'm a Canelo fan, but he's a bit.h in regards to Golovkin.

 

You've not broken anything down and is my alleged "well then/well"....whatever that is supposed to mean. You are doing the exact same thing with Spence that you complain Golovkin fans for doing with GGG.

Irrespective of their age Spence has fought NO ONE, whilst Golovkin has dominated a division, closing in on all the records, unified the belts and been avoided like the plague. Just look at Canelo, could only fight at Caneloweight but has now jumped up to his new division of super Caneloweight to avoid Golovkin.

Regarding Brook.......guys resume is littered with trash other than porter..one good win at WW and he 30 plus fights deep...then a farce of a fight at MW when his team stopped it at first sign that there might be trouble

Your words, you obviously don't rate him so even if Spence was to win he should get no credit and still be regarded as a hype job.

 

Don't worry, Shockmaster, you're entrance was as good as always.

 

But Spence won't be doing anything because you've already said Brook has faced nothing but bums so even if Spence destroys him it won't mean anything according to your logic as Brook has only faced bums.

And let me know how beating Brook, if he does, has him closing in on Golovkin, LOL.

 

The WBA wouldn't even sanction his last fight cos his opponent was so poor. Those are the fights he walks away from Andre Ward for lololol