Brook v. Bundu????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by camden1nj, Aug 17, 2014.


  1. camden1nj

    camden1nj Active Member Full Member

    1,449
    3
    Sep 6, 2008
    It would be a good test and could get a quality gate in the UK.
     
  2. S_o_F

    S_o_F Guest

    I can actually see this as a first defense.

    Bundu is no mug though, and would probably be a more difficult fight then Porter.
     
  3. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    I would like to see it.

    I'm not sure the risk/reward ratio would work for Eddie Hearn but its a fight between two of the legit best welterweights in the world, not American hype jobs.
     
  4. cippi

    cippi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,155
    888
    Feb 28, 2009
    make it happen
     
  5. S_o_F

    S_o_F Guest

    Makes sense as Bundu beat Purdy and Gavin and should be known as a test to the boxing casual.
     
  6. S_o_F

    S_o_F Guest

    Bundu on twitter saying he hasn't been paid for the Frankie Gavin fight
     
  7. CupidStunt

    CupidStunt Guest

    Would rather see Brook beat the **** out of a well known name in the US, Guerrero or Rios would fit the bill nicely. Bundu may well be better than both those guys but he doesn't do anything to take Kell closer to a superfight with Pac/May
     
  8. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
    Can't see Hearn giving brook a fight that isn't on the easy side as a first defence in Sheffield . No point a nice easy defence at home then khan there's no need to risk a khan payday
     
  9. Ol' Bub

    Ol' Bub Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,213
    758
    Feb 28, 2012
    People who don't know what they are talking about would **** on it but it's a good fight.
     
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,159
    27,884
    Jan 18, 2010
    Brook isn't a Warning fighter is he? So I see no roadblock on that issue.