Brook v gavin has been announced and it is on sky ppv...! I spent time yesterday defending Eddie Hearne but this is a disgrace.
That is 2 PPV fights in a month on top of huge subscription fees to pay the wages of mediocre Footballers. I liked Eddie Hearn but he is dinning at the table of Frank ****** at the moment.
Come on Brook needs a soft touch after that Dan fight and if he's taking on the animal Brandon Rios he'll need to be well tuned and ready. You couldnt throw him in with a killer like bundu or a josito lopez at this point.
It's on the May 30th card right? It does have 3 Title matches...It's a lot better than the Cleverly Bellew PPV- in fact it's stacking up to be one of the better cards of the year. Linares and Gradovich aren't bums and add in some decent british title fights like Ryan vs JW Hibbert and Cardle vs Evans- as well as Joshua fighting Johnson- there's a lot worse you can have on PPV Course Gavin Brook isn't great- but least Kell's getting out again quickly, if the PPV was being sold on this alone then yes it's a disgrace. If Brook fights a bum next fight after this voluntary- then he rightfully deserves to be slated.
HAHAHHA no way brook fans can defend this BS especially after brook called out the big names and defended the jo jo dan fight as the mandatory. now you have this ****py fight? big joke
Not at all- I think that the model of using Sky Sports and Sky Box Office for fights is extremely flawed and unfair on the fans, unless its for a Mayweather Pacquiao or something of that calibre, but the sad reality is that Hearn has promised Sky something like 4 PPVs a year and he has to deliver. Cleverly Bellew was awful- least this is a step up from that.
Hard to argue with this. It is not a competitive fight. The WW division is steeped in talent and Brook picks Gavin? Chri$t on a bike
what a fking joke, would like to see the brit****s try to defend this. In no way does this cherry picker deserve a floyd/pac fight.