brook v senchenko

if true then haahhahahaahahahahahhaha

 

More like a boring UD, barring another tear in Slav's paper skin.

 

Probably a final eliminator

 

Guys a former champ, give him some respect guys.

 

Former paper champ, slightly more respectable than K9 Bundrage. (if that)

 

Awful fight.

A B-level Malignaggi made this guy look like a novice

 

Senchenko is actually a good fighter, shows what you people know. By far Brook's toughest test.

 

What is the point of putting him in a fight with Senchenko? What will it prove?

I mean Paulie managed to get a TKO victory over him and he's one of the most feather-fisted fighters to have ever won a title.

 

Problem is none of them wanted to know. So here we are.crap that it is

 

You talking about the same malignaggi who took broner to another level?...
Paulie is no mans mug.
Would Kell have been as good v Broner?
Senchenko is an OK fight for Kell.He's an experienced tidy boxer who is ****ing huge at the weight.Knocking out even a shot Ricky Hatton in his backyard is easier said then done.
if and it is a big if...If kell dominates and stops senchenko then yeah by all means call on a higher level...let's see.....for the record I would fancied Devon Alexander to dominate and stop Kell Brook had it happened.

 

How many times have you seen him? Every single defense of his WBA title was made against improbable contenders who did squat to net their ranking, and in each he looked more suited to a Euro belt holder based on his flat performances. Most damningly, he went life and death with Nuzhnenko (ignore the cards) who later went on to drop eight clear rounds to Matthew Hatton.

Even against shot Ricky Hatton, Slava lost every round clearly until the sixth.