Floyd is the guy to fight for a payday.Pacman and Canelo also i guess and some other guys,but nothing compared to what you can get against Floyd really. Im not trying to defend Golovkin or anything,in other threads already mentioned my opinion that he had to move up to 168 already,Wade fight is a joke.He had to fight Canelo at 157-158 or smth at least,may be in the future.
Brook would be more of a challenge than Canelo. He's bigger and possibly stronger than Canelo and he beat Matthew Hatton far more impressively than Canelo. That being said Kell gets a Vanilla Brownie right down his goozle.:deal Canelo Vs. Hatton http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlSG0QadDKI Kell Vs. Hatton http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FwdbGeoHQE
No, you're wrong, the fans deserve fights where two guys are FULLY HYDRATED and at their physical best, not with one guy at his best and the other guy half dead because he had to make a ridiculously low weight. But hey, this is 2016, and people are so morally bankrupt that they think it's okay for one guy to use a catchweight as leverage in hopes of luring the other guy into a "big fight," even though it's an almost guaranteed loss for the bigger guy having to cut extra weight due to the fatigue and weakness that go along with it. Every fighter offered a catchweight fight should reject it entirely and tell the other guy to grow some sack, man up, and fight at the WEIGHT CLASS THEY CLAIM TO BE COMPETING IN. We need the weight classes for means of comparison rather than having matches contested at arbitrary weights. Like it or not, championship belts are here to stay. Do you want a different belt for every increment of 1 lb from 105 up? Do you love chaos? Who's the best 172 lb fighter? Who's the best 173 lb fighter? Who's the best 238 lb fighter? Trying to rate, rank and classify fighters without the framework of weight classes would be an absolute mess.