Bruce Woodcock v David Haye

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Oct 17, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,813
    Sep 15, 2009
    I pick Haye over all those you mentioned.
     
  2. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,261
    May 18, 2006
    On what grounds?

    His Heavyweight resume consists of wins over a faded Monte Barrett and John Ruiz, a debatable decision over Nikolay Valuev, a stoppage of a pathetic Audley Harrison, a gutless effort against Wlad and the circus act against Chisora.

    So you give Haye the title of the second greatest h2h British heavyweight based on this???

    You're a smart guy but I just don't get why you rate him so highly off of so little.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,813
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't rate him second greatest, not by a long shot. I do rate him second best h2h.

    Based on the eye test more than anything else and when doing cross era comparisons the cw division plays a large part also.

    In his prime he lost to Wlad whilst amassing victories over:

    Valuev, Ruiz, Chisora, Barrett, Mormeck, Maccarinelli, Fragomeni, Gurov, Abdoul.

    Is it the greatest resume? no, but it's enough that I can label his skill set legit. He was out of his depth against Wlad, but I don't think anyone in british history outside of Lewis is anywhere near that level neither.

    Hay has explosive hands in both speed and power. His upper body movement is top class. The guys you listed, I don't see what tools they have to beat Haye. I'm not saying it wouldn't happen, but I am saying if I was a bookie I'd make them all underdogs against him.
     
  4. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,261
    May 18, 2006
    Granted he has impressive physical tools and his Cruiser efforts were very good but at Heavyweight he's done next to nothing, certainly not enough to favour him over a big, powerful legit heavyweight like Bruno (whose losses to Smith, Witherspoon and Tyson 1 are arguably as impressive as wins over Harrison and Chisora ever were).

    Would Haye be able to beat Lennox Lewis for 7 rounds, last 12 with Joe Frazier or even find a way to beat a 6'7 Heavyweight with decent skills like Akinwande?

    I just don't see it based on what he's produced thus far.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: i forgot about your low opinion of Haye until this bump.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,813
    Sep 15, 2009
    Styles make fights and I seriously doubt he'd last twelve with Frazier nor be ahead after 7 against Lewis.

    I do however think he could outlast Bruno until he tired and finish him off with a come from behind knockout.

    Akinwande is an interesting one, I always felt he had more to offer than he showed. and Certainly more than he showed against Lewis.

    It mainly comes down to the eye test with this for me. I watch Haye, I watch those you listed and I think Haye can do it based on his performances in the victories I mentioned.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    My opinion of Haye has actually risen with his 5 round beating of 28 year-old journeyman contender Chisora. Probably his most impressive HW win/performance to date.
     
  8. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    I tentatively go for Haye I feel his speed may be the key in this match up
     
  9. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    I make you right there, I was thinking the same when I read the point you are referring to.