Bruno, Ruddock, Mercer, Holy, Lennox, etc. all destroy Wlad

You are the only one looking daft.

 

"Using the three losses (over a DECADE AGO) of a 63-3 resume to prove something is as ridiculous as using the 3 wins off of a 3-63 resume to prove something" EXACTLY!! :deal :good

It's entertaining watching you destroy this kid with facts and logic. (Including his at least two other alts he not so cleverly exposed himself with earlier in this thread)

The TS posts the same type of hatred on FB. Claims he's from Italy there too but doesn't resemble your classic Italian. Sad that racists (of any kind) and their irrational agenda still exist in the 21st century but then again he appears to prefer living in the past :-(

He uses one of the cookie cutter coping mechanisms. The Champion he hates "could never beat fighters from the past". The others are to label the "opponent as a bum" (even though they probably picked them to win the fight) "They are on PED's" (with absolutely no proof) "The division sucks/weak era" (fighters are bigger and stronger than ever. Iron Mike will tell you that) "You DKSAB" (while offering no evidence but an irrational opinion) and when all else fails, using 5th grade insults atsch

Wladimir Klitschko says he wears this type of criticism like a badge of honor. He knows they are terrified of him and his success.

 

mercer was 41 and 5 yrs past his expiriry date bro

 

:hi:Jakeoaree Harris....:hi:Bye Jakeoaree Harris

 

he lost every second of every round in their first fight, and was gifted a draw. he had a .500 or worse record, against every top flite hw he ever faced.

 

Lennox is the only one out of those guys I'd feel confident of beating prime Wlad.

Holyfield struggled with big super heavies and doesn't have the kind of one punch power to take Wlad out with one shot. Holyfield's best chance is to make Wlad gas and stop him late. I'd favour Wlad to win a decision, Wlad simply wouldn't engage and smother Evander at every opportunity. If Evander had more power I'd favour him but he doesn't. Though with his speed, durability and work rate he'd give Wlad a hell of a fight.

Mercer best performances were losing ones. While Mercer did lose a one sided fight with Wlad he was 41, had a lot of tough fights by then and was way past his best. He'd be very dangerous with his jab and durability. He could definitely pose some problems and would be dangerous. But even at his best he was poorly conditioned and simply may not have the work rate to apply enough pressure to win. Some will point out the Lewis fight but that was in a tiny ring, against Wlad in a standard sized ring he'd struggle to find him for long periods.

Ruddock at his best would be dangerous he defintely has the power to end it with one shot. Also prior to the Tyson losses he had the durability to not be blown away and make it a long fight. But once again like with Mercer he just fought in spurts, so while dangerous and barring a lucky punch Wlad would outpoint or stop Rudduck late.

Bruno's jab would give Wlad problems. Bruno had the longer and heavier jab. He also had the power to KO Wlad. But Wlad with his superior speed, accuracy and movement would likely be the one the crack Bruno's chin first than the other way round. Bruno would be in a competitive fight when it happens and it maybe close on the scorecards but at some point Wlad hits him with a big shot and he freezes and Wlad finishes him, probably in the mid to late rounds.

 

Yet you bring up beating a washed up, retired fat Holmes as Tyson's best win. But Wlad gets no credit for beating Mercer.

Yea totall unbiased :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

I always remember Ian Darke commentating on the Wlad vs Mercer fight where McCrory was praising Wlad for they way he dominated and hurt Mercer, something Lewis couldn't do. Right after he finished Darke responded with "what we have to remember is he was beating an old shot Ray Mercer".



Yes he wasn't prime but in Lewis's next fight he beat up a even more washed up over weight fighter in Tyson and it's a great win.

I normally liked Darke commentating but he was infatuated with Lewis.

 

He beats all of these guys without a doubt in my mind (Lewis would be an extremely tough fight). Lewis would probably start as the favorite or possibly a pick'em.

What do you think these guys bring to the table that would derail Wlad?

 

Looking daft because I don't fall into line of fanatical overstatement from a diehard Klitschko devotee? I don't think so.

Grant "blown away" by a broken ankle? Please?

The fact such loose, piecemeal examples of Wlad's opponents' achievements are offered up as some kind of reliable benchmark, in such exaggerated fashion to beef up Wlad's résumé, should tell you something (unless you yourself are a diehard Klitschko devotee :think).

 

Did he or did he not get dropped prior to his ankle going?

Yes and whilst it was how he went down that caused the break he still went down from a punch.

It's a sad state of affairs when a overhyped HBO backed fighter like Grant is ranked 3 in a heavyweight rankings.

Grant was poor, deal with it.

 

Mercer was too inconsistent to pick against an ATG HW like Wlad.

Bruno has a horrible chin himself, far worse than Wlads... Ruddock was good at knocking out bums, and hasbeens but lost to the elite.

Fights with Holy and Lennox are a bit harder to pick. But I definitely favor Wlad against the other 3....

 

Funny all you haters for last 10 years cant search and find one just one fighter to REALLY challenge Wlad. Surely your hate groups could have developed someone JUST one guy. Are they all playin in the NFL.:bbb:bbb

 

I can see Wlad losing to Lennox 6 out of 10 times. But not to Holyfield, unless Wlad gasses out which he wouldn't do anymore. Holyfield doesn't have the punch to KO Wlad, he'd lose UDs 7 out of 10 times.

Wlad KOs or UD12s random guys like Bruno, Ruddock and Mercer without losing more than 1-2 rounds max.

 

That washed up Holmes 4 years later would go on to beat prime Mercer. So the old Holmes Tyson beat was leagues above the Mercer Wlad beat. So you can't compare the two wins in any way. So yeah Wlad should get no credit for beating up a shot fighter a washed up Holmes beat when Mercer was prime.