>>> Bumlovkin Jacobs is NOT a PPV worthy fight...

and you care about that because?

 

is bumlovkin not a banned term? if the lgbt groups ever saw this kind of stuff they would lose their minds

 

Who said it is?
>>>Look at this idiot arguing with himself lol

 

Yeah exactly I don't think it's going to be is it?

Tell you what though I agree with Mallinagi on this about this fight being a better one than Canelo,I'm interested to know what folk on here thinks about Jacobs and if he can stay with Golovkin,Jacobs won't run I know that much?

 

If those other tomato cans, taxi drivers, and bums were ppv worthy . this one is with out doubt ppv worthy

 

he wont run, but he will lay down on the canvas like he has been shot

 

As far as I know they have the date secured for Dec. 10th on regular HBO. also from what I understand Fury Klitschko II also has that date secured, but will be shown earlier during the day, that is if Fury is mentally and physically fit to fight.

 

We don't know if it's being proposed as a PPV yet, and if it is, don't worry... no-one's going to make you buy it.

Your concern for the financial wellbeing of your fellow boxing fans is laudable, however.

 

Honestly, before Mayweather and Pacquiao I wouldn't have thought so either. But now we have pay per view fighters instead of pay per view fights and if Smith vs Canelo is pay per view then Jacobs vs Golovkin is too.

 

It's a very good fight. Ppv worthy, I'd say not.

Jacobs, CEJ then winner of Canelo/Saunders.

Could be a great time for MW division.

 

Didn't you say that Golovkin would duck Jacobs? Now you changed your tune, bet welcher?

 

Nay_Sayer embarrassing himself again with another shitty thread/post?

 

I think it's just good to see him being consistent for once.