>>> Bumlovkin's best win....

Can you explain why you believe Brook is 3G's best win?

 

You can do better than that. Show us how intelligent you are, and explain why Brook is his best win. You can do that, can you?

 

Probably Brook or Murray which isn't saying much. Brook is skilled but outsized by GGG but in P4P speaking Brook is the best fighter he's fought. If Brook was a legit MW he would beat Murray going away and probably would have beaten GGG as well.

 

Nay_sayer is sad guys, lets cheer him up and get him on the path to being a productive citizen.

 

theres plenty of smaller more skillful fighters who 'would' beat so and so heavier if he was that weight. lol

stupid thing to say, i wouldnt fancy ward against the likes of denis lebedev, uysk etc.

 

That's what you get when you look at boxing like a video game

 

How many guys do you know that jump up two weights and immediately face the best guy in the division and have success? I'll wait. Brook is a good fighter but he was beaten by size and power not skill.

 

Gerez...your reading skills are just pure dog sh*t. Do you even get what you replied to? From your response, you clearly have no idea.

 

exactly you numskull, weight matters, so does strength power and toughness.

if so and so was this weight he'd beat that man.

 

I know what I replied to clown. Brook was beaten because he was the smaller man. Had they both been the same size GGG would have been in a world of hurt. Hell even at Brook's first fight at MW he was making GGG look silly at times. It's not easy to jump up two weights and take on the best guy in the division and have success even though Brook lost he made a good account of himself because he outboxed and made GGG look silly and bad at times.

 

if Brook was a middleweight GGG would have taken a different fighting approach similiar to when he fought Lemieux.