Rawling is much better than Ian Darke, trouble with folk here is that unwittingly, they dont like commentators that arent pro brit, & as darke is more biased than Rawling? hes more respected. Its true, watch out for it casual readers! Brit posters only like commentary that is pro brit, thats why Darke & Woodhall are the faves here, cos they tell the incredibly needy posters here what they want to hear, instead of the awful truth. Rawling & Watt arent quite as biased as ****** & Woody, so they get more stick. Simples, as meerkat would say.
I don't think thats true, Dunky. Most of the more knowledgeable people respect and enjoy Watt's commentary, I believe. He's a million times better than Rawling or Darke, they're both peons in comparison. Neither has anything other than superficial knowledge.
So Lopez, are you going to just keep bumping this shitty thread over and over. its ****ing pathetic man... You're not even funny with it, just come across as a complete and utter ****wit.
I don't think we will see an awful lot more of buncie coz bn will collapse next year just like satanta did IMO
I'm certainly not pro-Brit and I don't think much of Sky's commentary until very recently (they were spot on for the Froch and Khan fights IMO) but Rawling just comes across as a fat clueless **** who makes some unbelieveable gaffes such as scoring a 10 round bout with "120 points" (a recent example). His voice is grating and annoying.
Bunce is ok, certainly no need for the OP's completely over the top hate. He has had a hand in getting many fights on tv that otherwise we'd not have seen so he gets my vote. I dont care if he is a cockaknee loudmouth He clearly loves boxing