Bunce was lying?

Same here :hi:

 

what a **** thread
Buncey wasnt lying.
robpalmer135 that disgusting twat just abused his name to troll around
Buncey just said he heard something. so he basically said he dont know ****
He has never said anything close to "I´m Steve Bunce and I tell you that offer was a lie" that was just what that ******ed **** made out of it.

 

woah i jsut posted what i heard.

 

Using blatant lies, Longcount shockingly went out of his way to try to assassinate another posters character.

Had he continued with it, poor ImElvis666 would've been labeled a ***** for the rest of his esb life.

A new low.

 

helluva ****ing job interview.

 

ah,,,now i remember why i stopped posting!!
a comedy of posts,
from grown-up fight-fans
and industry experts.

 

My email:
Subject: u've only gone and done it again.

you said there was no 50-50 offered for the haye klit fight when we all know now that this wasn't true and 50-50 was offered and refused. i know your a big fan of using false facts for hyping fights but can you contain yourself once in a while.

Email sent from Bunce:

There was 50-50 in Klit's eyes but not in Haye's eyes. See BNews. I look after British boxers - not hype or false facts.
Adios.

 

Here's a theory. Wlad offers 50-50 no options.

How does this look from Haye's point of view:

Wlad - 50%
Haye - 50% minus Sauerland's share (whatever that is) = less than 50%

Make sense?

 

Have we got to the point where someone complains Vitali really beat Lewis, yet?

 

I've only read page nine and I had to check the calendar to make sure that it was not 2003! This is a throwback!!!
OK,...
When was so-called 50-50 made?
When did I say it was not made?
When was it made public?
You see, it's about dates. My pal Dan Rafael is, if I'm not mistaken, writing about something that I had spoken about 20 or even more days previously. Things change. Dan's tale and take is shaped by the passage of time. He has had time to digest and chase. Give me 21 days on each tale!
This is the way proper journalism works...I call somebody up...let's say a geezer called Harry. I say: "Harry, is Scott Harrison going to fight for you again?" This geezer called Harry says: "No." However, somebody in Scotland insists that Harrison is coming back with Harry. I don't care what the person in Scotland tells me, I have to go with what Harry tells me. Get it. Now, three weeks later it emerges that Harry and Scott spoke about a comeback, which will not happen. So, Harry was still telling the truth and so was I. Get it again?
I hope that this ends it - I will be back each and every Thursday on BBC London 94.9 selling British fighters!
Adios.

 

I don't get it??

 

no you intentionally abused Bunceys well regarded name to troll around. admit it you ****
your an absolute disgrace to any boxing fan around the world

 

This thread would have made a great scene in a movie - the drama - plus the timing of Buncey's intervention is spot-on:yep

 

i posted what he said on his radio show. nothing else.