You sometimes come across as a right haughty ****er. Such a strange sense of your own self worth. He was happy to accept criticism before in return for the free advertising. Now he is not. It's his perogative. The positives outweighed the negatives. End of. Example: if you **** up your 'rankings', do you get loads of idiots hurling abuse at you saying your biased, in the pocket etc. He claimed to "tell it like it is", you claim your rankings are 'unbiased'. You could easily make an argument that they are. If people did that would you continue to post these rankings? Would you ****.
There not my rankings. There the brit forums. Nobody has ever accused the rankings of being biased because there not. and if they did it would be going agaisnt not just myself but other posters who reguarly contribute. go to the rankings and tell me where there biased. off the British fighters ranked if you compare it to the ring there generally lower placed. Same Alafoabi - The Ring No.6, Me No.6 M.Murray - The Ring No.9, Me No.9 Khan - The Ring No.3, Khan No.3 Me Higher Froch - The Ring No.4, Me No.3 Macklin - The Ring No.7, Me No.4 Burns - The Ring No.5, Me No.2 Ring Higher Cleverly - The Ring No.5, Me No.8 Groves - The Ring No.7, Me No.14 Brook - The Ring No.5, Me No.8 Mitchell - The Ring No.6, Me No.13 J.Murray - The Ring No.7, Me Unranked worth pointing out that Cleverly, Groves, Brook and Mitchell are 4 of my favourite British fighters.
Used to be a massive Bunce fan, but since he has been with Boxnation it has been cringe worthy watching him. Still don't mind Steve though, knowledgeable guy who can have a laugh, just needs to tone down the bias.
How did i not get the point? I got it. But the rankings are not biased. If someone accuses them of being so I can back it up. Buncey claimed not to be, and that he never would be.....but he is.