Burns/Mitchell - Who's the better win for British Boxing?

I think Mitchell would try and do something more with his career instead of fighting the latest TTG like Burns will

 

Burns will have to step up eventually.

and when he does he's got more of a chance than Mitchell against the top guys.

Imo

 

Why? Burns had the far harder draw on his weigh to being a world champion.

As a 21 year old he fearlessly took on Graham Earl at 2 days notice for **** money, Alex Arthur and Carl Johansson. Meanwhile Mitchell was fighting road goat farmers from Ghana.

 

I dont think there is one, if your asking who the more dedicated,clean cut, PC correct guy from Britain to be standing there with a World Title is ? then we all know thats Ricky Burns, these two are just outside of the "world class" bracket for me and have contrasting attributes, Mitchell more naturally talented and a more varied skill set, Burns dedicated to his craft and not wilting in desire to become a champion

If your asking who has the more potential to light the world up after this fight im answering Ricky Burns

 

Mitchell has a better style and is more exciting, Id rather watch him than Burns any day of the week. It's better for everybody if Mitchell wins, think of the pain you will have to endure having to watch Burns.

 

Biased much?

 

I much prefer watching Mitchell, but Burns is more active, a more dedicated professional and a good role model. In answer to your question, Mitchell.

 

The only non-biased Scottish poster on here is DFTaylor.

 

:good

 

Burns, what the **** has Mitchell done? answer me that, seriously, what has he done? beat John Murray?? WOW!!!!

 

An In shape Mitchell, Of course.

 

In the grand scheme of things Burns has done little more. His titles are absolutely meaningless.

 

You're making me blush.