I'm not disputing it pal, just saying that was the convo thought you'd misunderstood what Billy meant :good
He's actually a good fighter. Not worthy of a number 1 ranking, but I wouldn't have any qualms about Burns facing him next. A big improvement over his last three opponents.
I can't state the fact that Broner is mandatory, How can i state facts when all i know is that he is number 1 and there is a good chance he will become mandatory then you will vacate if the fight is forced. Mandana has already stated he is ready to fight Burns next. He is awaiting your call.
I reckon it'll be that Fegatelli to be honest, Sykes would have been a possibility before he lost. Even Wa77en wouldn't stoop as low as Foster Jnr after his beating the other week would he? Even after a standard eliminator win over Al-Hamidi. Unless they import some unheard of scrub in from overseas, which, spade a spade is a strong possibility. Every time I see Billy talking **** on here, and hurling abuse and smileys at anybody who dare even think of criticising these joke defences I think: "Maybe it'd be nice if Burns lost to one of these nobodies to shut Nelson up". But then you see Burns fight, his enthusiasm, and his apparent desire to fight Fana or unify the belts and you can't help but want the lad to do well.
broner is ranked number 1 , tomlinson is ranked 3 to me that means broner is the mandatory BUT.... i put a thread on here the other day saying that the WBO have had 4 different no1 contenders in the last 4 months im pretty sure that broner wont be number 1 next month still the burns vs fana fight has to be made