Burns to be stripped if he doesn't fight Gonzalez

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by USA Rob, Mar 25, 2013.


  1. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    [url]http://m.scotsman.com/sport/boxing/ricky-burns-faces-title-stripping-threat-1-2857614[/url]

    Seems strange. Mitchell was a mandatory as well.
     
  2. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Wouldn't rule out a little pressure from a certain rival promoter who has good links with the WBO...
     
  3. This is a good excuse to fight him !! Pretty good excuse - #newagepromoting

    After youtubing gonzalez I can't belive he is even a mando
    He can punch - agaisnt bums - and that's about it - he has a wild style which should pick off easy

    His first fight with matchroom was always gonna be a fight to make him look good

    But he a big name is a must in sept
     
  4. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    If this is the case why not do it?At least he's unbeaten.Ricky being the first to beat him won't hurt,although wouldn't be surprised at a distance fight.To me its better than a defence against Gavin,who whatever they say is coming off a loss.Nothing against this one whatsoever.A warm up against an unbeaten Latin mandatory,then as Anabolic says,a unification.Lets hope Vasquez.
     
  5. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    Sorry Anabolic,you said big name,not unification.But I guess Vasquez covers both.
     
  6. boxzone

    boxzone Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Jan 16, 2013
    This has to be a fight before his main fight against a big name in the division. With Broner stepping up he should look at taking the division by storm. Vasquez or Abril or the most noticeable steps
     
  7. Robert

    Robert Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,342
    0
    May 12, 2009
    just read some of the wbo rules and i does seem you have to make a mandatory every 9 months so june would be about right for a mandatory with purse bids called 90 days before fight

    Dont you think is strange the Vazquez team have not made a big deal about the Burns fight been off

    Matchroom must have some friends with the WBO they had Hide, Collins, Eubank all defend the WBO title numerous times
     
  8. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Barry Hearn's tweet suggests it's a big name...

    Big announcement from eddie today in glasgow. He has only done it again ! Proper fights for proper fans. Number 1 no doubt.
     
  9. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    If it is Vazquez he won't have to fight his mando will he?
     
  10. Claypole

    Claypole Boxing Addict banned

    7,071
    4
    Aug 4, 2007
    It's very strange. The fight was supposed to be rescheduled and considering how big a fight this was you would have thought there would be more fuss made.
     
  11. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    I think so
     
  12. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    The WBO will give Burns 90 days to defend against Gonzalez, after May 11th.
     
  13. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Must be Vasquez! :happy
     
  14. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Mitchell was a voluntary defence.
     
  15. DeMarco

    DeMarco Active Member Full Member

    888
    0
    Sep 12, 2012
    Could be Yuri Gamboa? Has he been banned? More likely to be Gavin Rees to be fair.