Burns up next for campbell.????

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Marv888, Aug 1, 2015.


  1. big_daddy

    big_daddy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,517
    25
    Nov 28, 2013
    The Vasquez that Mitchell beat in January? Would be a good one IMO
     
  2. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    No chance, Campbell isn't going to get put in that deep yet, top class potential but hes not at the top yet.
     
  3. boxingcrazy

    boxingcrazy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,239
    52
    Jul 3, 2010
    tbh i never seen anything in rickys performance against that african ebola victim that makes me think he would be too much for luke, tommy coyle is a come forward brawling type anyway but ricky doesnt do that at all. even last night you could see he wanted to box the african lad and looks very uncomfortable when he is being made to force the fight. lukes hand speed would ensure that he gets the win against ricky and imo although ricky is levels above coyle i think luke would look better beating ricky than he did coyle.
     
  4. dannyboy147

    dannyboy147 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,798
    1,384
    Jun 2, 2010
    Why does Burns trainers always hold the pads so high? Nelson and Tibbs both done it, looks uncomfortable for him.

    IMO burns beats Campbell, Coyle, Ward and Crolla but loses to Mitchell.
     
  5. Injin Chi

    Injin Chi Member Full Member

    346
    54
    Oct 26, 2013
    Isn't it to make it more difficult so that come real fight night it's easier. It's the same principle as sparring heavier guys. No??
     
  6. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Not many go the distance with him , he doesn't look it but I think he is pretty heavy handed.
     
  7. dannyboy147

    dannyboy147 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,798
    1,384
    Jun 2, 2010
    Not sure, haven't seen anyone else do it. Even when he shadow boxes he punches up. Only other fighter I've seen do it was Haye in prep for Valuev lol
     
  8. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    There'd be very little risk as Campbell would absolutely destroy Burns. It'd be a monumental mismatch.
     
  9. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Burns is way too high risk.

    Supposedly Campbell is now highly ranked in the WBC. If he wasn't then Burns could've been high reward as it announces him on the world stage.

    Burns could be bested technically but then be able to tough it out and take him into deep waters.
     
  10. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    When was the last time you watched Burns? When has he done that in recent times?
     
  11. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,324
    Aug 27, 2011
    Campbell wide UD burns. burns looked very bad.
     
  12. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    It's about age and experience.
     
  13. sikeside

    sikeside Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,383
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    why do you talk so much sh*te who has ever destroyed RB? The guys never been stopped ffs you really are a maggot sorehole why do you even bother
     
  14. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Terrence Crawford.

    Came away from home, boxed in first gear and Burns didn't get close.
     
  15. sikeside

    sikeside Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,383
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    Outclassed not destroyed. You were foaming agin sorehole