Burns v Guerrero - who wins ?.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iced, Nov 5, 2011.


  1. iced

    iced Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Sep 30, 2010
    What happens with this match up ?.
     
  2. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,030
    18,302
    Jul 29, 2004
  3. Luscious Lopez

    Luscious Lopez Active Member Full Member

    1,044
    11
    Apr 25, 2010
    guerrero by stoppage.and he'd need to,if it was on one of ******'s uk shows.
     
  4. 1_man_army

    1_man_army The Knockout King Full Member

    2,511
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    This content is protected

    You really are butthurt over that aren't you?

    Burns won deal with it. The judges scorecards were too wide but Burns still won at least 7 rounds clearly.
     
  5. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    Guerrero is different class form everyone at 135(not incl. JMM). Burns would put up a great shows vs Rios.

    Ghost UD 116-112
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    :nut Burns put on a great display tonight, but Rios? Can't tell if you're being serious or not.
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,338
    9,946
    Jun 23, 2008
    Rios would utterly destroy Burns.
     
  8. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    I feel Rios is being somewhat overrated. Burns would certainly lose to him because Rios wouldn't hesitate in the same way that Kats did at times, but for the most part Burns showed himself to be defensive tight digging those elbows into his body and keeping that guard up top nice and strong. He looked to possess a more study chin than tonight than the Burns that got rocked at 130 by Rocky. He's not a varied enough boxer to beat Rios but I don't see it being some kind of absolute slaughter in the style of a Tzsyu-Gonzalez.

    Guerrero pisses on anybody at 135, aside from maybe Marquez.

    That being said, are both Rios and Guerrero guaranteed to keep making 135 for much longer?
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Who has Guerrero defeated at 135lbs to suggest he is in a different league to Rios?

    Katsidis barely landed a flush shot to the chin all night. I wouldn't judge Burns' ability to take a punch at 135lbs based on tonights result.
     
  10. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I made several posts earlier making clear I'm a big fan of Burns,but that's partly for non-boxing reasons.He's made a lot from a little but I know his limitations.I'd rather he steered clear of Guerrero.
     
  11. rjko23

    rjko23 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,345
    1
    May 17, 2010
    rios v gurrero would be a great fight.... the ultimate boxer vs brawler match up.


    imo guerrero is the best boxer in that division. thats including marquez.
     
  12. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Rios is an educated brawler. He doesn't take the kind of flush shots that Katsidis is accustomed to taking, and he reacts to his opponent quicker. Not that it would be a one-sided event, but I would probably favour Rios to beat Guerrero over the distance. I'd love to see it.
     
  13. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    Think Guerrero needs another fight at 135 for us to get a true idea of how good he is,but the signs are there.Hope he gets big fights,the medical bills his wife must have incurred will have been sky high.
     
  14. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Indeed. I don't think we can really gauge Guerrero's quality based on victories over Michael Katsidis, Vicente Escobedo, and Joel Casamayor. The latter has been horribly shot for a while.

    Let me rephrase that. I don't think we should heavily favour Guerrero over a quality operator like Rios based on those level of victories. Those are solid wins.
     
  15. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    Rocky didn't really land too many on Burns either over the course of their fight but that one flush shot sent him down in the first, Kats was able to get through a few times and Burns never looked in any trouble. Maybe I'm underrating Burns's chin based on that first round against Rocky Martinez. As you say though, and as I stated earlier he looked defensively solid from front to back so he didn't take that much punishment.

    As for Guerrero, he let himself down against Casamayor by engaging in that boring almost farcical sparring session but I thought he beat Katsidis more solidly then anyone else has done. Kats couldn't get to him at all and while someone with Kats's defense is the type of opponent Guerrero should shine against, I'm backing Guerrero as the 135 based on what skills I think he possesses. Those of a smart, range controlling boxing who works behind precise and economical punching, especially with shots coming down the pipe. I don't think his 135 resume is as impressive as Rios' who rides ahead with the Antillon, Acosta and Peterson wins. I'll admit that is a good resume for a young fighter like Rios. I'm just basing it on what I personally see in each boxers' arsenals.

    I do rate Rios, hes a very good young fighter and if he faces and beats Guerrero I wouldn't have any problem giving him his props and saying I was wrong. I'd love to see them get it on at 135, or if thats not possible 140.