Buster Douglas -vs- Hasim Rahman:

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Holmes' Jab, Oct 18, 2007.


  1. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Battle of the longshot underdogs who shocked the world, at their best (ie: Tokyo Douglas vs Johannesburg Rahman)


    12 round contest, who wins?
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,959
    3,439
    Jun 30, 2005
    Douglas.

    He was way more talented and skilled, he was just so lazy and inconsistent for most his career.

    People called Rahman the next Buster Douglas after Rahman lost the rematch, but I had tons of more respect for Rahman when he lost to Lewis than I did for Douglas after losing to Holyfield.

    At least Rahman trained hard and tried to win. He was just outclassed by a superior fighter.
     
  3. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    18
    Feb 9, 2005
    You can apply the term "lazy and inconsistent" to Rahman too.

    Douglas MD
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,959
    3,439
    Jun 30, 2005
    True, but I thought Douglas was more gifted and skilled.

    People would talk about how Rahman was a talented underachiever, but I never saw what people were impressed with.

    He was a big strong guy with some nice right hand power and a terrific jab. His jab is the only thing that really impressed me. His speed was average, his balance was not good, his combos were not good, his chin was shaky, and so was his stamina.
     
  5. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,539
    27,155
    Feb 15, 2006
    Both on their best day Douglas wins easily.

    Both on an off day I might go with Ramhan.
     
  7. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Douglas TKO11 Rahman. :good
     
  8. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,863
    3,111
    Apr 16, 2005
    Douglas was a far better fighter, and he took a better punch. He'd probably stop Rahman in the middle to late rounds, after jabbing circles around him.
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,550
    Jul 28, 2004
    The Buster Douglas that fought and destroyed Tyson would humiliate Rahman. Utterly no contest, like it would have been for Lennox Lewis if he had properly prepared for Rahman the first time.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,352
    Jun 29, 2007
    I agree with this. Douglas to me had more ability.
     
  11. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    Rahman could pull off another Lewis fluke, but i doubt it.

    Douglas finishes him off in 10.
     
  12. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,146
    Aug 26, 2004
    I never was really impressed withRahman other than the 1st Lewis fight but other than the Tyson fight I was not impressed with Douglas, he was an underacheiver....close boring decision
     
  13. Langford

    Langford Active Member Full Member

    830
    3
    Jul 22, 2004
    difference between being good, and rarely putting your heart into it (Douglas)
    and being better than average and trying most of the time. (Hasim)

    On their best nights, Douglas wins.
     
  14. Charles White

    Charles White Chucker Full Member

    8,936
    2,161
    Sep 13, 2008
    Would have been a good fight while it lasted. I am a fan of both fighters. As big a fan of my man Rahman as I am, I would have to go with Douglas by ko in the later rounds.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Rahman was a live dog, but technically Douglas was superior