Buster Drayton from Philadelphia vs Julio Cesar Vazquez from Argentina. Who do you think would've won? Here is some footage for better visualization: Buster Drayton: This content is protected Julio Cesar Vazquez: This content is protected I choose Drayton to knock Vazquez out on the later rounds tho somewhere 7, 8, 9 & 10 but overcame some dramatic moments and possibly 1 or 2 knockdowns.
Not baiting him, more like teasing him. Like c'mon, he likes to sh!t on any fighters he dislikes and be overly biased towards fighters he likes. I think we all can see and understand that Vazquez was a good, solid fighter with some outstanding skillset but Seamus sees him more than that. He's a great champion with many title defenses bla bla bla and so on. I got so triggered on how many times sh!ts on Satterfield. A fighter with decent sparks on both his hands like bro, what the hell? Many can see that Satterfield is more than that but Seamus? No... he REFUSES to see it Just the other day Seamus upset everybody with his opinion on Rex Layne. Saying he's a decent fighter who lacks fast-twitch muscle fibers and always goes off balance.
Vasquez is the most underrated fighter of his generation. A top five great in his division. At his peak, a very hard puzzle to solve. KO7
I think Vasquez out works him to gain a close decision with Buster having many moments but not enough. Don't think Vasquez stops him - Hilton couldn't. Norris couldn't. Think Vasquez can hurt him but Buster can hurt him too. It would have been a very interesting fight.
15 rounds with Matthew Hilton 12 rounds with Terry Norris 10 rounds with said Said Skouma 10 rounds with Lindell Holmes 10 rounds with Davey Moore No way in hell Vazquez could knock Drayton out, at least not in a million years