**busting the Myth about VK Vs Lewis**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DoumB, Jul 3, 2007.


  1. DoumB

    DoumB HOYA KO1 PRESSCOT Full Member

    1,491
    0
    Sep 18, 2006
    tired of klitshcko haters and Klitshcko nuthuggers.
    At the time of the stoppage,
    - Klitshcko was ahead on the 3 scorecards but it was a CLOSE fight

    -The cut was caused by the thumb of LL and not the punch itself,

    - No one was about to be knocked out in the 7th like some may beleive here

    - it was a close fight that ended due to an injury, and in boxing its part of the game so STOP with the excuses
     
  2. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    Another Lewis/Vitali thread. Love it!
     
  3. Guru_Too_You

    Guru_Too_You ESB OG circa '99 Full Member

    3,217
    0
    Jul 24, 2004
    And will you give credit to the second cut? Or blame that one on a thumb as well?
     
  4. Smith

    Smith Monzon-like Full Member

    5,953
    2
    Mar 8, 2007
    Lewis was going to knock out Vitali in the 7th no doubt

    ; }
     
  5. 1-Ton

    1-Ton Walking in the Light Full Member

    1,716
    1
    Sep 15, 2005
  6. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    766
    May 12, 2007
    a wise man would have just let it rest:-(
     
  7. DonPrestige

    DonPrestige Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    No one was getting knocked out when the fight got stopped, it was a close fight and that is why there should have been a rematch.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  9. DonPrestige

    DonPrestige Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    The funny thing is I thought this was a forum for people to discuss things, so if people have strong opinions and keep talking about it whats the problem. If people have better ideas for threads start one. Damn its better than talking about Holyfield and his comeback.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Lewis already had plenty of money, was talking about retirement for some time, was old, and came in at the highest weight of his career...a tell tell sign a fighter is past it.

    Ignorance is bliss....just too bad it only seems to be viewable from one side at a time.
     
  11. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I believe the 2nd cut was caused by a huge uppercut that staggered Vitali. Obviously that's a legit punch so yes it counts.
     
  12. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Bull****, you can be no more certain that Lewis was going to KO Vitali then the other way around.
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    God knows it would've been a huge rematch and that's why everyone wanted it except Lewis, who figured he dodged a bullet, and that is his right after all.
     
  14. 0-1

    0-1 Guest

    Lewis was very canny in not taking the rematch, just as he was in many other aspects of his career, such as when he elected to fight Tyson. He retired just when it seemed likely he would lose, and so was able to retire as champion, having beaten everyone he'd faced, with a great legacy. He probably would have lost the rematch, which would have given boxing a recognised champion, but it would have been at the expense of retiring as a loser. I think he still would have been remembered as a great: no one does down Ali for the fights he lost when he'd gone on much too long, and I think a loss in the rematch would have been recognised as due to age, and a loss to a worthy champion. Then we'd probably be debating forever what would have happened if VK and LL had met when both in their primes...
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,955
    3,423
    Jun 30, 2005
    Well that I don't blame Lewis. Tyson is the one who gave up his WBC belt in 1996 to fight Seldon (or was it Holyfield?) instead of Lewis.