By Modern Standards, George Foreman was a Caveman

Cotto beats Hagler?

 

I understand that you are Glover by another name.

 

No idea who that is.

If I remind you of him though he must be a smart chap.

 

Troll. Sugar Ray Leonard was chubby? Attention seeking wind up merchant, Glover. Now **** off.

 

he understood well enough that you are a simpleton first time.

everyone did.

 

No, he was a ****, like you. You don't believe any of this **** that you spout, you are a troll. Bye bye!

 

So you've surrendered?

To a man from Vietnam.

Typical American

You know I'm right. Just repeat to yourself, "Athletes get better with each generation" and you'll eventually understand.

 

You need to watch his fight early in his career.

If he didnt have his guy outta there by rds 4 or 5, he was there for the taking. Yeah, it took Ali to make it happen, but it was already a parkinsons Ali who beat him.

2nd career George wouldve laid first career George out in 8.:thumbsup

 

parkinsons ali who beat him?

what symptoms are visible during that time that are indicative of parkinsons type diseases in Ali?

please point them out, and that foreman steamrolled the entire division until ali came along. no 37 year old retiree beat foreman, let alone instantly in round 1.


point them out, or admit you are talking crud.

 

it wont explain nothing, but it might give us a pointer to the insanity needed to believe your crud.

 

Just about everyone on this forum is telling you that you are an idiot, what is that telling you?

 

The people saying that are Americans.

Forgive me for not taking their opinion seriously. I mean, these are the same people who believe in bigfoot.

 

This guy is either:

a. a troll

b. an idiot

c. a child

d. a combo of the above


Surprised at how many people have actually spent time trying to debate and change his mind. It's best to leave him alone in the corner to think about what he's done, reevaluate his life.

 

What is there to reevaluate?

Do you actually deny that athletes get better with each generation? Despite the scientific evidence, records and research that proves it is so.

Dullard.

 

Boxing is slightly different in its emphasis on technique and innate toughness. It is conceivable that the most iron chinned man who ever lived was born in 1500 or even in 2000 BC. We have seen athletic fighters get defeated by **** boxers like Carlos Maussa, who doesn't use any modern training methods and has little boxing skill but has innate qualities that make him tough to beat (hard punch, awkward angles, great chin). His training? Delivering refrigerators.

Anyone can see that the decreasing popularity of boxing assures that truly athletically gifted sportsmen seek out an easier sport unless the culture only promotes boxing. Morales could have existed in 1950 just as easily as 2000.

Another factor is the entitled attitude of the modern athlete who will not perfect his craft before being granted a nonsense belt. Guys who come up the hard way seem to face adversity better regardless of athleticism.