By Modern Standards, George Foreman was a Caveman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Dec 19, 2014.


  1. Big George

    Big George Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,867
    20
    Jan 16, 2011
    54 dear mate as you masterbate...
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,013
    48,112
    Mar 21, 2007
    Foreman was a "caveman" by the standards of his day, not by "modern standards." Probably the OP and the pile-on that likely happened behind it ignore an excellent jab - which was a part of the reason he was a success "by modern standards" during his comeback.

    Second, he has a great chin and a great punch. That type of **** never goes out of fashion.
     
  3. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    His ability to cut off the ring was state of the art, too. By today's standards, he'd be pretty advanced, in that regard.
     
  4. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    hahahahahahahahaha i love big handicapped george ,long my he stay on here making a fool of himself

    i was going to say i can't wait until you get dementia but judging by your stupidity id say it set in with you in your 20's
     
  5. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    oh jesus the old men that live on the mountain masterbating to colouring books are here to tell us of the good old days
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Thank you !
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    i'd 2nd foreman knocking out everyone around today. these tall clowns would fall harder.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,013
    48,112
    Mar 21, 2007
    Except I didn't do that, at all.

    Mr.Grumpy Pants.
     
  9. theword

    theword Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,669
    7
    Aug 3, 2009
    Some HW of the modern era would beat him sure. But a lot of 'the glamour division' today look like dog**** in general.
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Valuev was one of the longest reigning champs of this era, outside of the Klitsckos, since Lewis retired.

    now im waiting for someone to show me he was more skilled than Foreman was.

    in fact that same bum Valuev lost to an old Holyfield.

    A younger Holyfield had more difficulty with an old Foreman than he did with a prime Valuev.

    Go figure
     
  11. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    you are , you boys on the classic forum lost touch with reality years ago, you might as well be up the mountain masterbating to colouring books and telling us that the world is going to end soon:lol:

    its easier to take some of the trolls like MVC more seriously than some of ye sometimes
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,013
    48,112
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, I'm not. You re mistaken - you have made a mistake.

    There is nothing in my post that spoke in praise of "the old days". It is something entirely made up in your head. Or you're congenitally stupid. No way for me to know which based upon two posts, which, by the way, are the only two posts of yours which I've ever noticed.
     
  13. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    yes of course this era is just so superior.

    With guarantees HoFs/ATGs like...........
     
  14. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    thats because im not up the mountains with the rest of your weirdo boys fighting over colouring books and commenting on the classic forum .:lol:

    people avoid the classic so they don't have to deal with weirdo's like you
     
  15. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    How old are you?