i asked you a question and you failed to answer it, i guess the men up the mountain have colouring books to fight over
Yeah, the whole point of that post you monumental spastic was that i've asked you numerous questions and you've "failed" to answer them. Which means, I suppose, that by your own standards you are "up a mountain fighting over colouring books" (whatever the hell that is supposed to mean )
Can you explain to me how good Sanders was? After all he whooped Wlads ass. Ill start you off, Outside of Wlad, the two best fighters Sanders beat were former mw Bobby Czyz and Michael Sprott. What about purrity? Who had 12 losses prior to facing Wlad
it mean your out of touch with reality old man and your afraid to answer a question for fear of ridicule
I doubt Foreman lands a meaningful punch on Wladimir before getting knocked out. I would bet my life on Vitali beating him.
Then basically you don't know **** about boxing. Vitali.never beat anyone worth a spit. Hes this so called great, show me a top ten list of who he actually beat without laughing out loud.
this is when you no someone is out of touch with reality Walcott weighed 190-195 with same day weigh ins at heavyweight where guys weigh in at what ever they want. walcott if he was around today would more than likely be a light heavyweight or an undersized cruiserweight, with no chance against wlad let alone being favorite. Beterbiev comes to the ring weiging the same as Walcott did if not more and so does Cloud Saunders weighed 225 pounds and was 6'4 , walcott was 5'11-6 foot and weighed 190-195 pounds
These morons who genuinely believe boxing hasn't evolved, or HAS EVEN REGRESSED in terms of skill are what holds the sport back.
So, what fear is it that's prompted you to avoid all the questions in this thread, you've been ducking? I pick Wladimir to beat Walcott. How about that for astonishing.