By Modern Standards, George Foreman was a Caveman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Dec 19, 2014.


  1. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    i asked you a question and you failed to answer it, i guess the men up the mountain have colouring books to fight over
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,013
    48,112
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, the whole point of that post you monumental spastic was that i've asked you numerous questions and you've "failed" to answer them.

    Which means, I suppose, that by your own standards you are "up a mountain fighting over colouring books" (whatever the hell that is supposed to mean :lol:)
     
  3. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Can you explain to me how good Sanders was? After all he whooped Wlads ass.

    Ill start you off,
    Outside of Wlad, the two best fighters Sanders beat were former mw Bobby Czyz and Michael Sprott.


    What about purrity? Who had 12 losses prior to facing Wlad
     
  4. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    it mean your out of touch with reality old man:lol:

    and your afraid to answer a question for fear of ridicule
     
  5. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    I doubt Foreman lands a meaningful punch on Wladimir before getting knocked out.

    I would bet my life on Vitali beating him.
     
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Im still waiting for you to explain how Valuev was more advanced than Foreman was.
     
  7. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Then basically you don't know **** about boxing.

    Vitali.never beat anyone worth a spit.

    Hes this so called great, show me a top ten list of who he actually beat without laughing out loud.
     
  8. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    this is when you no someone is out of touch with reality:lol:

    Walcott weighed 190-195 with same day weigh ins at heavyweight where guys weigh in at what ever they want.

    walcott if he was around today would more than likely be a light heavyweight or an undersized cruiserweight, with no chance against wlad let alone being favorite. Beterbiev comes to the ring weiging the same as Walcott did if not more and so does Cloud

    Saunders weighed 225 pounds and was 6'4 , walcott was 5'11-6 foot and weighed 190-195 pounds
     
  9. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    So weight equals success is that what you're saying?
     
  10. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    These morons who genuinely believe boxing hasn't evolved, or HAS EVEN REGRESSED in terms of skill are what holds the sport back.
     
  11. :deal
     
  12. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    im saying would you back Tavoris Cloud or a guy his size in fact to beat Wlad?:lol:
     
  13. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    how exactly, specifically has boxing progressed?

    Please explain.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,013
    48,112
    Mar 21, 2007
    So, what fear is it that's prompted you to avoid all the questions in this thread, you've been ducking?

    I pick Wladimir to beat Walcott. How about that for astonishing.
     
  15. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    So Moorer, Holyfield, Spinks, Haye, Adamek, could never move up to heavyweight and be successful?