By the stage of his career that Seth Mitchell is at, Tyson was undisputed champion.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Mar 12, 2012.


  1. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    With 9 title defences.

    He was also much younger.

    yet Mitchell is "not ready" to face a contender yet, but one day will rule the division? :think
     
  2. dinnynosher

    dinnynosher Active Member Full Member

    1,250
    4
    May 6, 2009
    He's been boxing only 2 years and dosn't have the natural talent that Tyson had.

    End thread/:huh
     
  3. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Tyson peaked extraordinarily early and faded just as quickly. I don't really see your point. Being undisputed in your early or mid-20s is absolutely magnificent but it shouldn't be expected from upcoming contenders.
     
  4. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Stop making **** threads.
     
  5. Don't Sleep

    Don't Sleep Personal Trainer Full Member

    3,403
    4
    Jun 16, 2009
    Tyson had also been in the sport since his youth. Whereas Mitchell got into the sport in his 20's and his KO percentage is nearly as good
     
  6. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    how can you even compare Mitchell to Tyson???
     
  7. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,116
    Apr 16, 2005
    Which is exactly why he will be Chris Arreola, if he's lucky.
     
  8. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Tyson was supremely talented, Mitchell is a bum.