That's your opinion, and you are entitled to it, but you're not entitled to your own facts. As far as "contractual clauses", its common in boxing, even Golovkin has used them. So what's your point?
When Canelo will be talked with Chavez as whose the best between the both of you will be rolling on the floor crying like a little baby you're boxing life SUCKS too much pain all your heros destroyed and beaten wrost part is it's against fighter's you can't stand and hate to death
Wouldn't this only hinder those who have to significantly cut to make weight, those who might be labelled by some as a weight bully?
Everyone knows the truth Pumpkin GGG beat Ginger twice. I know it, You know it & best of all Ginger knows it LOL youre the haters you hate GGG because he beat gingers ass TWICE Poor El Pollo Rojo
If you like. A fighter shouldn't need to rehydrate significantly on fight night so it shouldn't be an issue.
Well there's two remaining points here. 1) trying to rehydrate significantly is not something that should be encouraged, the fighter shouldn't have dehydrated significantly in the first place. 2) it seems a bit hypocritical to call a fighter a weight bully, but then call him out for preventing weight bullying as well.
I agree with you. Unfortunately people will try to take every advantage they can get. Gee, I dunno. Shrinking to 154 to beat up on smaller guys and then going up to higher weights and demanding that the bigger fighters don't do what you have done your entire career is what seems hypocritical to me
If his in ring weight was a higher proportion of the weigh in, I'd agree that's hypocritical. Tbf I'm just relieved that Canelo keeps fighting legitimate opposition and I hope it continues. I remember being convinced he'd duck Trout and Lara which were the definition of high risk low reward fights. Since then he's proved me wrong time and time again.