I don't honestly Don't think she cares she's like 70 years old and she probably got a 1-2 million dollar side check for that score
What is really odd, is she has pretty high consistency index. Her record judging has been pretty stellar until the two big money fights in question. That seems to suggest there was some external pressure.
Its usually not hard to judge a fight, especially one as one sided as that one. corruption continues to be rife in baaxing. not sure how they can get away with it in this day and age
Does anybody know what kind of money one would make if someone dropped say 20k on Floyd via UD 12 Saturday ?
Fire her and ban her from entering another boxing venue for life, send a message to corrupt judges or you get more of it.
Finally something is done about this ****. That card was absolutely inexcusable no matter what her reasoning. She's either incompetent or corrupt and either way she needs to be banned for life. The same goes for any other judge to ever turn in a messed up scorecard. There are times when the fight is hard to judge and in those cases it is semi-acceptable but should still be reviewed thoroughly for any wrongdoing, but in this case the scoring was very clear cut. 90% of viewers would agree that Alvarez won no more than 3 rounds (and that's being very generous).
Guy's a two-faced liar. Here's what he said in another interview: "I regret the outcome," Brady said. "I don't regret the person. She's a good, honest person. She did the best she could and she believes in her outcome." These people are all crooks and are playing good cop- bad cop on the public. Once Ross is gone, another crooked judge will replace her ( female most probably). Just watch.