Calazage only faced bums in his WBO title? OFFICIAL BREAKDOWN

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Sep 24, 2008.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Which of these were bums:

    Chris Eubank - legendary champ

    Robin Reid - former WBC champ who would be robbed against WBZ/IBF CHamp Otke

    Woodhall - former WBC Champ

    Brewer - ex IBF Champ, arguably robbed against Otke

    Mitchell - ex 2 time WBA Champ, arguably robbed against Otke in his last fight

    Lacy - IBF Champ, top 10 P4P on many lists

    Kessler - WBA-WBC CHamp with wins over no3 Mundine

    Which were bums????
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,907
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, fair post.
     
  3. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    you forgot the great Manfredo, second coming of Ray Robinson
     
  4. slicksouthpaw16

    slicksouthpaw16 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,920
    16
    Jan 26, 2008
    Please show me any list where Lacy was top 10 pound for pound, because i have never seen it. He hasn't even beaten a top 3 fighter at super middleweight and was only a one time champion, so in my opinion who ever put him on their list was just throwing random names in there, because Joe himself even said that Lacy didn't fight anyone. Kessler and Eubank were great wins, and the other paper champions like Woodhall was decent as well. I wouldn't consider them bums, just not upper echelon super middleweights.

    One thing that i should point out though is the fact that Eubank was clearly past his prime and was never mentally the same fighter after the Michael Watson tragedy. I would say Kessler was his best win as far as young champion and even though Hopkins was clearly over the hill as well, he was still the recognized light heavyweight champ.
     
  5. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Kessler was the only fighter he beat in their PRIME, everyone else was shot to **** except Lacy who wasnt anything to begin with...
    1 fighter in their prime......thats it
    10 years and 1 fighter in their prime........besides the names you listed cabdrivers filled the time in between
     
  6. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    It's a good list altough not extraordinary,but not bums either
     
  7. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Exactly. It isn't gods gift to boxing resumes, but none of those fighters are bums. If you are at either end of the extremes you are being a biased dickhead.
     
  8. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    indeed.

    joe's resume is solid, rather than spectacular or awful.

    wins over sheika, veit and bika are decent work on top of the above mentioned fights.
     
  9. sebcfc

    sebcfc Member Full Member

    466
    2
    May 22, 2008
    They are not bums, the only people that say they are bums are haters. But at the same time, its not the strongest list. The problem for Joe is that he was he a division that did not have many/any big names in it by the time he was coming around. He was just a little bit too late to fight Benn and Collins (who actually did not want anything to do with him) and had to fight an fading Eubank. By this time Jones was not around anymore, and as for Ottke, well hands up to anybody who would have gone to Germany to fight him if you were in Joe's position?

    Then after that all that was left was Lacy who he totally took to school, and Kessler who he beat easily. So for me Joe was in the right place at the wrong time (kind of like Rocky M), as SMW is starting to become a great division. Also when it comes to Joe, people have to remember that for most of his career he was placed in the high risk/low reward catagory, thus people like B-Hop and RJJ, who Joe would have moved to fight, never wanted anything to do with him.
     
  10. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Please explain to me how any of them were "shot to ****" including Eubank who would go on to two very close challenges for the cruiserweight title in later bouts! Losing one fight does not make a fighter "shot" otherwise the vast majority of today's pound for pound list qualify!!!
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    On most ESB P4P lists he was top10, as high as 7, people were talking about him going all the way to heavyweight, about him being the new Tyson. They were talking about him KO'ing Taylor, Hopkins and Tarver.

    In an ESB poll practically everyone picked Lacy over Tarver, Not to mention 80% of ESB picked him over Calazage :lol: but now everyone on ESB 'knew' Lacy was limited, yea right :lol:
     
  12. slicksouthpaw16

    slicksouthpaw16 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,920
    16
    Jan 26, 2008
    Yeah i definitely see what you mean although i have to admit, it was very easy to jump on the Jeff Lacy bandwagon by the way he was looking pre Calzaghe. He was a very good fighter before Joe beat him and was a favorite to win, so i personally rate that win highly for Calzaghe because Lacy WAS dangerous. Its true that he didn't beat anyone and was always a limited fighter, but that doesn't take away Joe's win. They have to look at the fact that Lacy was a top 3 super middlweight at the time, undefeated, olympic bronze medalist( i think) and was the favorite to win.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    To be fair to LAcy, he had beat 3 top10 fighters including beating Vanderpool more emphatically than Hopkins. He also destroyed Reid who had just been robbed against Otke and took Calazage to an SD. Reid was said to have the best chin in the business

    After the beating he took against Calazage he'll never be the same again. No one punch was brutal but that made it worse. Clazage landed 1000punches and Lacy was nearly out about 10 times but because Calazage didnt have a massive punch it dragged the beating out
     
  14. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    This is a common misconception. I can guarantee Calzaghe didn't land over 1000 punches, hell if Paulie Malignaggi landed over 1000 a guy would be out! He may have thrown over 1000, but landed... To give some idea Barrera and Morales landed around 300 each in their first toe to toe epic. 1000 punches is like 85 a round, that's just silly.
     
  15. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Serious question and not an attempt to cause a row, how do you define an upper echelon super middleweight? I've noticed you use this phrase a few times and it doesn't seem to include world champs or guys ranked 3 or 5 in the division at the time. Which fighters who have been active in the division over the past ten years would you consider upper echelon super middleweights?