Callazo - thoughts?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Maxmomer, Jan 25, 2009.


  1. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I thought he was robbed against Berto and Hatton, personally. If those two were official wins on his record, where would he be ranked as a welter and P4P fighter?
     
  2. TomaTos

    TomaTos Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    I dont know, he cleary beat Berto, not sure about Hatton ill have to rewatch it.
     
  3. lONGCOUNTED

    lONGCOUNTED I Killed MMA Full Member

    2,003
    0
    Sep 5, 2008
    I think that Collazo beat Berto, but the last two rounds definitely cost him. The Hatton fight was close and harder to score imo.
     
  4. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Berto landed the better shots. He wasnt robbed but it was very close. He`s a great TV fighter though. Brilliant chin and never say die mentality. Collazo will be back.
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I'm not necessarily asking whether or not you think he won these fights, they were both close and I suppose it comes down to individual perspective, but what do you think would have happened had Callazo been given the nod in them both? Where would he rank?
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Collazo beat Hatton in my opinion.
     
  7. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Mine to.
     
  8. MightyLondoner

    MightyLondoner Underdog Full Member

    909
    0
    Sep 17, 2008
    How can you come to this assumption? Watch the fight again and score each round by round, although I think Collazo had the better rounds he didnt have the majority so hence forth Hatton's victory
     
  9. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    227
    Sep 28, 2007
    I had Collazo winning both by 114-113.
     
  10. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Is anyone going to answer the question put forth in the original post?
     
  11. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Because scoring is subjective. Im sure your well aware of that and hence why one of the judges had it as close as 114-113. It is my opinion that Collazo`s body of work was far superior and crisper. I dont score punches for ineffective aggresion, cuffing blows and poor ring generalship. I stand by what iv said.
     
  12. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    The fight could have easily gone either way...I scored the fight just as Harold did, Collazo winning 7rds to 5. But, i could see how someone would have scored the fight 7-5 for Berto.

    I feel bad for Collazo...he is now entering the dreaded "no-man's land".

    No one will want to fight this guy...he's too much risk for the reward.
     
  13. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Naw he`ll get fights but he`ll be seen as a gatekeeper. His been unfortunate against Berto and Hatton. Against Mosley he was soundly beaten.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I scored it twice 6-6 and then 7-5 to Collazo, it was very close.

    Mosley ofcourse beat the crap out of him winning every round pretty much
     
  15. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    Interesting hypothetical, but topic starter is giving Collazo too much credit for fights he came up SHORT in.

    sure Collazo could have, or "should have" won

    but he didn't, and it's slowly becoming a common theme of his.

    rather then ponder what could have been, why not live in the reality? (that Collazo coughed up both fights)