Calzaghe fanboys! Convince me that Joe deserves to be ranked higher than RJJ or BHop!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Drunkenboxer, Dec 5, 2008.


  1. sonny73

    sonny73 Active Member Full Member

    958
    0
    Feb 27, 2006
    People keep going on about Calzaghe not being in the all time top 100 or not above Jones or Hopkins all time,how do you judge?.

    He is easily a top 5 guy in his era which by all accounts makes him an all time great along with MAyweather and Pacman from this era.Is Mayweather better than SRL or is Pacman better than Duran,impossible to judge as they come from different era's.But like all sports the latest era is usually producing the best fighters due to improving genetics training and diet etc.

    I see very few boxers of any era being able to handle the stamina Calzaghe has.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,913
    45,737
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, I wouldn't say it's ridiculous, or garbage, but 168 is a young division. If we start matching Jones with guys who move through 168 things start to get interesting.

    Lloyd Marshall
    Ezzard Charles
    Charley Burley
    Archie Moore
    Sam Langford

    Now things are interesting.

    Gene was tough as teak, what a *******, but i'm not an expert, loads of gusy in classic know the guy better than me. Black Eyes To You knows him well if you can pin him down.
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Things are indeed interesting as those are five incredible fighters, but realistically, put them in a ring with the awesome athlete that is Jones and I do believe he would dazzle them all, despite at least three of them being greater than him in a p4p sense.

    I may privatemail that guy then as I am currently constructing my p4p top 100 and Fullmer is one of those guys I find it really hard to assess.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,913
    45,737
    Mar 21, 2007
    Realistically, there is nothing on Jones's resume that indicates he could beat any of these guys. However. I agree that this is not the whole story. Jones is obviously never to be outclassed. But I feel if a puncher gets to him he will go. I can't beleive that he will be able to stay abreast of all of them.
     
  5. zarman

    zarman Guest

    you say that like jones should be ranked higher than BHOP :think
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Because I take great pleasure in harpooning every lame post and dire attempt at humour he ever embarrasses himself with.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    That was 3 I thought of off the top of my head, there are obviously more, I just don't note their names down every time I notice such dog****, sorry. The thread-starter had a perfectly valid base for a thread IMO, the guy was only asking a question.
     
  8. One Round

    One Round Hertfordshire's Finest Full Member

    2,964
    15
    Nov 24, 2008
    In my mind Calzaghe needs a couple more wins against world class fighters for him to be on the level of RJJ, or even B-Hop for that matter. Calzaghe's problem is he was content to easily dominate manditory challengers in his own backyard at Super-Middle for too long. Calzaghe's obviously a great fighter and probably 2nd best p4p atm. But i think he needs a couple more decent names on his resume, like a Dawson or Taylor to satisfy his critics.
     
  9. zarman

    zarman Guest

    if critics are not satisfyed they wont be after beating dawson or taylor
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Why? How does this make sense? The critics aren't satisfied because he hasn't beaten a satisfactory number of quality opponents to justify the ATG status he is widely credited with. A win over Dawson would arguably be the best win on his resume - therefore it would improve it a hell of a lot and go a long way to satisying many of the critics. Stop making out as though Calzaghe is some much-maligned hero that is the victim of some hate-filled global conspiracy - he isn't. The criticisms are perfectly valid until such time as he has fought enough quality fighters to justify ATG status.
     
  11. Drunkenboxer

    Drunkenboxer Least Eligible Bachelor Full Member

    60
    6
    May 12, 2006
    Right, so the terms of the contract wouldn't have suited him. He would have taken a pay cut and been made to fight in someone elses backyard. That seems like a straight-forward example of a bad risk/reward ratio to me. Whether the percieved threat was a dodgy ref and thick judges or the opponent is immaterial, because either fight COULD have been made had any of the guys decided it was worth enough to them. And at the end of the day.... Do you really think B-Hop was ever scared of Calzaghe?

    As for unifying the division, that's a weird technicality. I'm still not sure as to why the Manfredo fight was considered a good enough offer to ditch his IBF title, but as far as i knew Joey C was never undisputed...
     
  12. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008

    American TV wanted a name they knew instead of the mando.

    He became undisputed when he beat Kessler.
     
  13. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    I am not a fan of any of them...but he beat them both...they got in the ring eith him colllected alot of money and he won both fights??? he will prob not be ranked higher b most but he still beat them
     
  14. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Who has ever said that Hopkins was scared of Calzaghe?

    As above, the difference is one of degrees. The difference between taking on a harder fight or taking on a fight where there's a real risk that you won't be allowed to win.



    Being undisputed champion by winning all the belts and not losing any of them in the ring is not a 'technicality'. If Hopkins had likewise been stripped of a belt, it wouldn't cause me to see his career any differently. The idea that we should view Calzaghe's career differently because he didn't fight Stieglitz is frankly bizzare.

    I'm not sure what your issue is with understanding the Manfredo fight. HBO wanted a known American opponent. They had no interest in Stieglitz. HBO was considerably more important to Calzaghe's future plans than the IBF belt, so they got what they wanted.
     
  15. Cultured Fist

    Cultured Fist Member Full Member

    328
    0
    May 3, 2008
    Roy would be ahead, lets face it he was a heavy weight world champ,. I'd say Bhop is on a par. Both Joe and Bhop didn't get the opportunity to show how good they were untill later in there careers but I've always rated Joe ever since he beat Eubank who was world class in my eyes and although past his peak was still very dangerous.