Calzaghe fanboys! Convince me that Joe deserves to be ranked higher than RJJ or BHop!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Drunkenboxer, Dec 5, 2008.


  1. spiderdon

    spiderdon Member Full Member

    410
    0
    Oct 30, 2009
    rjj higher than jc bhop beneath bhop,
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Joe is easily the greatest 168 pounder all time. I think it is hard to dispute that. However all time p4p I would not think so. Roy and Nard done way more
     
  3. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    Calzaghe aint done enough to be near BHop and RJJ
     
  4. Drunkenboxer

    Drunkenboxer Least Eligible Bachelor Full Member

    60
    6
    May 12, 2006
    ...And that's a big piece of the puzzle for me. Calzaghe fans love to criticize Bernard Hopkins for fighting guys like William Joppy and Kieth Holmes, and citing that as evidence that his era was weak. But those guys held the belts, and 'Nard kicked their asses because domination of that division was his objective. He also faced all the young undefeated up-and-comers for better or for worse. Granted, he lost to RJJ but he went on to beat Glen Johnson KO11, Joe Lipsey KO4, Roy Ritchie KO7 and Tito Trinidad KO12... Domination.

    And let's face it: Calzaghe's era of "Domination" at SMW was no stronger... He didn't even fight his own mediocre belt-holders (Lucas, Beyer, Ottke). Ottke retired 34-0 FFS...
     
  5. unknownprophet

    unknownprophet New Member Full Member

    14
    0
    Aug 11, 2009
    in terms of who has the better resume calzaghe is nowhere near hopkins. RJJ's resume slightly better than calzaghe's but in terms of skill I put calzaghe just barely ahead of both of them.

    hopkins has fought the same way at the same pace for over ten years now so you can't say a prime hopkins would beat him.

    if joe fought roy in his prime I think the fight is a toss up. Jones' hands would be slightly faster and he wouldv'e thrown 15 to 20 more punches a round. However jones was all about timing his opponents and calzaghe is nearly impossible to time. but with jones' ridiculous handspeed calzaghe wouldn't have been able to slip so many punches. if joe didn't have such a good chin I'd say roy wins but I say prime calzaghe beats prime RJJ by two or three rounds.
     
  6. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    RJJ - no.
    Hopkins? About level.
     
  7. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    He made a career out of chasing unifications with Ottke and Beyer. He once offered to take a fight with Ottke for 1 euro plus travel expenses, anywhere Ottke liked. No love. He took to beating opponents of Ottke and Beyer right after they fought them. Never got to unify until 2006 against Lacy.

    Calzaghe wanted Hopkins in 2002 when Hopkins was a middleweight, but Hopkins intentionally nixed the deal by demanding more money at the last minute. It's interesting that Hopkins moved straight to light-heavyweight from middleweight and never bothered to stop by 168 for a fight with Joe. It's even arguable that Hopkins was still at or near his prime when he fought Joe--the man seems to have gotten better with age.

    Roy Jones never had an interest in fighting Calzaghe...he was the big star, making tons of cash by beating up nobodies in America. By the time Calzaghe got his title in 1997, Jones had already been at light heavyweight for a year. Jones fought Hopkins for a title the YEAR CALZAGHE TURNED PRO. The Toney fight occurred one year later. All the talk of prime Calzaghe vs prime Jones is interesting, but in reality could never have happened. Calzaghe was a huge risk for Jones and the reward would have been minimal (think Calzaghe vs. Dawson).

    The talk of Calzaghe hiding in the UK to avoid America is unjustified. He never got a hometown decision, or needed one. He could sell out a 50,000 seat arena and still appear on American PPV. Crowd noise is sometimes said to be beneficial to a fighter, but I'm going to go ahead and assume that it doesn't mean that much to an international-level professional athlete. High-school, sure, college, maybe, but we're talking about professional fighters here. I think that if the money was right, there's no reason a good fighter wouldn't want to go take on Calzaghe, regardless of the location. It just so happens that there wasn't a whole lot available to Calzaghe in America until he hit the big-time by taking down Lacy on Showtime. If there were any great American supermiddleweights around during Calzaghe's time, I'm fairly certain they would have met with him. The fact is that guys like Jermain Taylor, Bernard Hopkins, and Roy Jones were doing just fine hanging out at 160 and 175, and they didn't want or need to fight Calzaghe.

    Calzaghe might not have the big names on his resume, but I don't hear many people saying that he would lose if he did. Most guys who are considered legends have losses to people they should have beaten. Calzaghe is 46-0. Most fighters will lose before they amass that kind of record, regardless of who they fight.
     
  8. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    Legacy of Bernard Hopkins:

    Dealt Glen Johson his 1st loss
    Gave Felix Trinidad (a blown-up welterweight) his 1st loss
    Beat De la Hoya (a blown-up, past his prime lightweight)
    Beat Antonio Tarver, who was aged
    Beat Winky Wright (a blown up, past his prime jr. middleweight)
    Beat Kelly Pavlik, who came up 10 pounds

    Lost pro debut-Clinton Mitchell
    Lost 1st title shot-Roy Jones
    Lost to Jermain Taylor
    Lost rematch with Jermain Taylor
    Lost to Joe Calzaghe

    Legacy of Roy Jones:
    Beat Bernard Hopkins
    Gave James Toney his 1st loss
    Beat Clinton Woods
    Beat John Ruiz for a heavyweight title
    Beat Antonio Tarver
    Beat Felix Trinidad (a blown-up, past his prime welterweight)

    Lost to Antonio Tarver in a rematch
    Lost to Glen Johnson
    Lost to Antonio Tarver in another rematch
    Lost to Joe Calzaghe (but past his prime)
    Lost to Danny Green (but past his prime by far)

    Legacy of Joe Calzaghe
    Beat Chris Eubank (past his prime)
    Beat Jeff Lacy (who was either overrated or completely ruined)
    Gave Mikkel Kessler his 1st loss
    Beat Bernard Hopkins (possibly past his prime)
    Beat Roy Jones (past his prime)

    No losses.

    They have 6 good wins, Calzaghe has 5. They have 5 losses, Calzaghe has none. Common themes are that they all seemed to prey upon older or smaller opponents. Hopkins particularly went after little guys, but he's about to make up for it by moving up to heavyweight. I personally think it's unfair to talk of Hopkins and Jones as all time greats while saying Calzaghe is below their level because of the opponents on his resume. Every great fighter fights 80-90% of his fights against nobodies. The good names on his resume are typically few and they almost always have some sort of asterisk due to moving up in weight or being past their prime. The days where you could have Muhammed Ali against Frazier, Foremn, Shavers, and Norton are gone. Great fighters are hard to come by, so we have to judge greatness not only by records but also by skills. And Calzaghe was p4p one of the best, in my opinion.
     
  9. Drunkenboxer

    Drunkenboxer Least Eligible Bachelor Full Member

    60
    6
    May 12, 2006
    You make some good points but you're being a little nicer to Calzaghe than Jones Jr or B-Hop. :yep I think you need to acknowledge that Hopkins and Jones were as much blown-up middleweights as Tito and Wink were blown up welter and jr-middles respectively. I'm also struggling to understand exactly what "aged" means in the context of Antonio Tarver. Hopkins was older, smaller and Tarver was the Ring mag LHW champion. Hopkins came straight up from middleweight without a tune-up and put a all-round whipping on him. There's really no negative you can draw from this performance, yet the only thing you can think to include is "was aged". "Aged". As though he's a bottle of whiskey. You need to explain what you mean, it makes no sense. :think

    You should also include that Hopkins and Jones both held all three major belts simultaneously at MW and LHW. They both owned their divisions and the term "Undisputed" holds a lot of weight in the boxing world.

    But it's absolutely pointless to speculate, isn't it? He could have beaten them, but he didn't. We can't just assume he would have won due to imaginary advantages. The fact is Joe C was not invincible, nor is anyone. He was also an absolute sucker for right-hands. The "Styles make fights" angle is getting a massive workout of it's own in the wake of the Green-Jones Jr blowout due to Joe kissing the canvas in round 1 and looking altogether less convincing against RJJ than former LHW champ Greenie. The same needs to be said of the opponents Joe C didn't face. Styles make fights. We can't just assume he would have won. He needs to fight. He didn't, his legacy suffers. Simple as that.

    Also, I think you need to recognize the line between what is fact and what's just plain smack talk. It doesn't matter what Joe Calzaghe says in the interviews or on TV about going to Germany for 1 euro to fight Ottke. I think we both know Frank Warren, the shittest promoter in boxing, does not operate that way. When the pens and papers are brought out things are very different than the papers would have you believe.