calzaghe has nothing to prove

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by deanlampard, Nov 10, 2008.


  1. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Put Dawson in with Kessler and then you'll see exactly how much Calzaghe 'needs' him.
     
  2. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    thats a sweeping statement but you're posting your preferences and i doubt so many americans - or non-americans - would call calzaghe 'great'.

    you have to dare to be great....
     
  3. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    No, Calzaghe is a great fighter and I am quite confident that the majority of American fight fans would agree.

    Dare to be great? That has to be a joke, in taking on both Lacy and Kessler alone he was taking on two men who were supposedly the future of 168lb fighting, both young, both fit, both big punchers, both in their prime, both comprehensively beaten.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Kessler, thus far, has proven to be utterly undynamic.

    In boxing terms explain why you think he would defeat Dawson.
     
  5. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,854
    0
    Oct 9, 2008
    The americans wll never accept a british boxer as a true great. Lennox Lewis, Chris Eubank and now joe are all world class, but not in the yanks eyes.
     
  6. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    I assume we're talking about Kessler moving up to 175?
     
  7. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    Bull****, you don't know what you are talking about, this kind of posting is embarrasing to other brits, unless it's a joke i've took wrong.
     
  8. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    Woops I meant this one!
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Which part, C? :huh
     
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Say again. You're babbling.
     
  11. Joe Pirrelly

    Joe Pirrelly Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    I see, the new Joe C band wagon - 'he has nothing to prove'. Yes he does. I'll give hime his earlier fights with Mitchell et al plus Kessler, Hopkins and Lacy. A few defenses against fresh up and comings and i'll be satisfied to call him 'an all time great' and attach meaning to that clean record.
     
  12. Joe Pirrelly

    Joe Pirrelly Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    And i'm a Brit and a big fan before you start
     
  13. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Joe Calzaghe has beaten one prime fighter in 46 fights, and that is Mikkel Kessler..So I guess in some peoples eyes he has nothing left to prove......but at 175 he's yet to beat a prime fighter. The only one out there really is Chad Dawson.

    So I guess if beating one prime fighter as well as a number of past its, than I would say you have low expectations
     
  14. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    I quoted your post about a possible Kessler/Dawson fight, so I'm assuming we're talking Kessler at 175?
     
  15. Joe Pirrelly

    Joe Pirrelly Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    Nothing bizaare about a mandatory asking for his fight, and respectfully at that! Too many people have been brainwashed by these ideas - a. There are no challenges left - Of course there are and Dawsons just one! and b. 'insert boxer' doesn't bring enough money to the table - The promoters must be laughing as they wipe their butts with $100 bills!

    note - I'm British and a big fan