Calzaghe-Kessler most significatn fight of the century...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by unclepaulie, Oct 2, 2007.


  1. Shane

    Shane Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    Sorry but you are wrong this fight is only getting a buzz in Europe... the mass amount of Americans do not care for two fighters who are scared to fight out of there country.. and who's records are more patted than a pair of huggies diapers. therefore the fight is mediocre at best sure your arenas will be packed with low income family's rooting for the countrymen but nothing else.
     
  2. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    You really think the fact many part-time American fans are ignorant to this bout somehow devalues it? Rubbish. This is as significant as any bout in history. In pure boxing terms. Fame is not a factor.
     
  3. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    How the **** do you work that out? Who the hell are you? Snotty ****er. Anyway, have you seen the price of the tickets!:nut
     
  4. box03

    box03 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Aug 19, 2007
    If its such an amazing fight why isnt on PPV, most boxing fans would rather see Holyfield try to regain a title.
     
  5. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    I suppose the fight is as anticipated to us as Taylor-Pavlik was to the yanks....except this fight has two more highly skilled boxers taking part than were in last Saturday's fight.
     
  6. stuistylee

    stuistylee j.c.chavez superstar Full Member

    1,734
    0
    May 22, 2007
    your getting more delusional by the day CHJ...most significant,relevant fight of all time...yeh...right
     
  7. box03

    box03 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Aug 19, 2007
    I bet you a month off ESB it wont be as exciting as Taylor/Pavlik.
     
  8. stuistylee

    stuistylee j.c.chavez superstar Full Member

    1,734
    0
    May 22, 2007
    forget ali's out of ring fame. he has nothing on calzaghe...what r u fukin on man???
     
  9. Shane

    Shane Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    Thank your lucky stars HBO put cash into this Non PPV match they did these two fighters a huge Favor nonetheless This fight means nothing the division itself is Rubbish and the best of the bunch witch are Calzhage and Kessler are very protected over hyped fighters Ali-Frazier? Please give me a break.
     
  10. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    If you think Fraizer is on Kessler's level, they you have to be pretty deluded. He beat Ali, that was it.

    You can see in video, Kessler is clearly the better fighter.
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'd say that the winner may be the greatest supermiddleweight in history, due to weak competition. Greatest of all time (the fight OR the fighters) is a ludicrous stretch.
     
  12. moff123

    moff123 New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Sep 25, 2007
    You are a joke! So Pacquiao vs Barrera means nothing does it?
     
  13. Shane

    Shane Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,645
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    In this thread you have exposed yourself as a Eurosnob with little Boxing knowledge. And its Significant not significatn :patsch
     
  14. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    That's where I stopped reading
     
  15. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    You are unable to to counter my Kessler>Fraizer argument?