Calzaghe: "Kessler, you are the best I've fought; you should fight Hopkins!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Nov 9, 2008.


  1. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    I'm not saying Kessler would beat Hopkins, but for sure he would have to work for the money.
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Whats next for Kessler ?If Froch a factor for real these days or is he looking at the Taylor Lacy winner.
     
  3. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    Froch is gonna get trashed vs Pascal
     
  4. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    Nonsense. Kessler is very fast and technically sound, not to mention he hits like a mule, to be owned by Dawson and BHop. Those would be close, probably great fights, but I'd actually favor Kessler in both cases - too young for one and too powerful for the other.
     
  5. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007
    Kessler would beat Hopkins imo.

    Kessler has the main ingrediant that Taylor used to keep B-Hop honest and that is an excellent snappy jab in which Kessler works overtime on.

    Thats not the only reason but it'll have to do for now as im off for me dinner.
     
  6. ayala

    ayala Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,052
    172
    Jun 21, 2007
    I Believe Hopkins Would Walk Through Kessler The Same Way He Walked Through Pavlik. Hopkins Is A Very Tough Fighter To Get To, His Style Is Very Difficult To Adjust To
     
  7. crespo21

    crespo21 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    0
    Mar 26, 2008

    not likely. dumb comment award winner. :patsch
     
  8. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007

    Hopkins is tough but so to is Kessler.

    Kessler is no slouch and up until he fought Calzaghe he had only ever lost a handful of rounds, let alone a fight!

    Plus Kessler has an excellent workrate, he is massive for 168, a big puncher and technically very sound.

    Hopkins looked good against a US hype job in Pavlik, who if we are all honest uses his size at 160 as an asset as he is geniunly fighting smaller guys than himself. And both times he has fought above 160 against Taylor and B-Hop he has struggled. By the way i called B-Hop to win 10-2/9-3.

    B-Hop is an awkward fight for anyone but i think Kessler would be mentally tough enough to see a UD.
     
  9. the prom queen

    the prom queen bitter and clinging Full Member

    2,449
    1
    Feb 18, 2008
    well to be honest I havent seen as much of kessler as I have hopkins
    saw the cal fight and probably about 40-50 minutes of youtube clips

    and style wise he seems similar to pavlik in that he is a bread and butter 1-2, circle and jab guy
    havent seen him do a lot of inside fighting
    think he is stronger than kelly though
     
  10. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    lateral movement and angles are kesslers kryptonite...waste of a fight for b-hop
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    So...what better fights out there are there for Bhops? Dawson? Anyone else?
     
  12. hugo

    hugo Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Jul 13, 2008
    Respect For Your Shift-Hitting Skills - Aside From That I Totally Disagree With Your Post.
     
  13. hugo

    hugo Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Jul 13, 2008
    Except of course that Hopkins is an excellent fighter. But Kessler is underrated and has a stiff snappy jab, which noone including Hopkins can do something about.