Calzaghe must be top 10 atg ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by madmanc3210, Jul 21, 2011.


  1. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Kessler is a very good solid 3 time champion.

    Lacy is a bum.

    They should never be mentioned in the same sentence.

    Kessler is the only good prime fighter Calzaghe ever beat.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,898
    20,476
    Sep 15, 2009
    This thread should be hailed as the worst of all time. Some posts in here honestly make me want to leave the site.

    I can't believe someone actually said the eubank joe beat is greater p4p than the duran hagler beat.

    Man I need a break from this ****.
     
  3. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    more like somewhere in the top 1000 almost ATGs
     
  4. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  5. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    Hopkins ranks ahead of him all time easily.
     
  6. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    The man hid in Wales behind the unrecognized WBOGUS belt, than came out to play against a pair of 40 something fighters in BHops in RJJ, definitely not op 10 ATG, hell not even top 50 IMO.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: Welcome to my world, again. You should stop feeding people who are only on here to troll like Headgiver and Failey. It's the biggest waste of time imaginable. They know nothing about boxing and don't want to learn anything. They're only here to push their sad agendas.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    And 10 for today:

    Tony Canzoneri
    Erik Morales
    Oscar De La Hoya
    Manuel Ortiz
    Lennox Lewis
    Orlando Canizales
    Nino Benvenuti
    Bob Foster
    Hilario Zapata
    Vicente Saldivar

    Another 10 coming soon... Plenty, plenty more to come... :good
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,898
    20,476
    Sep 15, 2009
    Unfortunately I agree completely. The only ever possible criteria you could have for putting joe over hopkins and jones is if you are basing it entirely on official h2h results in which case you'd have to rank berbick above ali.

    I tried debating with these guys but seeing the same old cum guzzling crap on these threads day after day, it's too much.

    They are all trolls. Complete trolls who don't really wanna discuss boxing at all.

    I literally have no patience for them anymore. Comments like joe is greater than hagler and hopkins doesn't have a victory as good as eubank, ignorance or troll. Neither are people I wanna debate with.

    I just hope for the sake of all that is good in the world that these idiots are the same poster. Or atleast some are silly newbies who will change their opinion once they dig the tiniest bit into the respective resume's.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    At last, someone else sees the truth. We really should do our absolute best to ignore pond-life like them. It is difficult of course, because it's a natural impulse to correct someone who is talking utter **** and pushing a very transparent agenda, but it really is a horrible, horrible waste of time and energy.

    Headbanger and Bailey really aren't worth the effort it takes to hit your keyboard. They are braindead trolls of the very highest calibre. Headbanger especially should be banned from the forum because he cannot make a good boxing thread, trolls incessantly, and is a racist. Why are they here? The guy is 34 years old and spends his time calling people "cum-guzzling trannys" and pumping up his friends saying they are "pwning" people, when the polar opposite is invariably true.

    We really should make more of an effort to ignore them, it damages our credibility even to be seen interacting with them, that's the truth.
     
  11. aka TORA

    aka TORA Full Member

    1,935
    0
    Nov 23, 2010
    marvelous would **** his **** up
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,898
    20,476
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah i'm gonna do my level best to never respond to one of their posts again.

    I mean top ten, they must have cringed themselves typing out that post
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    I will try as well. I've been trying recently, but their rank ****ing stupidity and stinking bias still occasionally draws a tongue-lashing out of me. Must try harder. :deal

    Who doesn't have better things to do than educate a 34 year old disgraceful lonely manchild who is obsessed with "cum-guzzling trannys"???
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,898
    20,476
    Sep 15, 2009
    All they ever discuss is joe and hopkins so they can just check my post history from now on.

    I hadn't really dealt with them until recently, head once asked why tito was seen as a top mw "just" for destroying joppy (he apparently wasn't aware just how long joppy was wba champ). I'd seen bailey's anti-hype style posts and for a bit I was intrigued until it became apparent he was just cross referencing on boxrec without any of his own input. Silencer and timeout just seem to be "yes men" agreeing with anything that's said, even something as ridiculous as suggesting joe would have stopped nard. But then I began posting more on general again and let myself get drawn in to debates with them and have concluded they're all muppets.

    Simple formula for ignorance: belief that joe is even comparable to hopkins or jones equals a lack of interaction by myself.

    They can call me a ducker or claim to run me out of threads, I just don't wanna waste time on the idiots.
     
  15. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    take heart knowing that the people who post like this don't really believe it. some people affiliate themselves too much to nationality and the plight of people in the sport they 'follow' becomes an extension of themselves rather than an objective bias