First one to test my theory on: do you believe that joe is greater (in a p4p atg sense) than hopkins and jones.
Prime 1995-2003, absolute peak 1997-2001. No-one in the world who has seen all of his fights from this period would disagree.
you are if you believe what you just posted..and went to a lot of trouble doing it. how do you know when calzaghe was "at his best" if he never beat a proven world class fighter in his prime. the whole argument around calzaghe and why people diss him is because he lived his whole career under frank ****** and then when he finally did **** him off, he fought hopkins and jones after they lost their mantles, hit their 40's and lost multiple times. who they fought and when, my friend. it's that simple and always will be.
You call RJJ the most overratted fighter in history while defending the the most overratted record in history ! Joe's undefeated record is the fluffiest undefeated record of all time yet you want to call Jones overratted He's not even close to being ratted all time next to Jones yet you want to call him overratted atsch
what the **** are you 2 ***gotts (popkins and lufc) crying about in this thread? i haven't even made a post in this thread till now and yet all you do, is sit crying about me, making false twisted accusations. if you have something to discuss on the matter then lets have it out right here, right now. all you 2 ***s are doing is trying to give each other a license to duck me and bailey because you know deep down that you cannot beat us in debate despite your cringeworthy ego's.
Why don't you **** off and plan your 35th birthday party. 3 invites to go out: you, your mum, and her big black lover Omar. Hurry and you'll make the afternoon post pick-up.
@silencer. Thank you for confirming my suspicions. We do not need to discuss this further. My final word is the 3 will be remembered like this: Hopkins Jones (closely together, opposite order if you put more emphasis on skillset. There are too many other boxers inbetween to mention joe in any representative fashion. Good day sir.
If you're going to include the like of Bika, Sheika, Brewer, Veit for JC as notable, you've at least got to include Echols, Eastman and Pascal for Hopkins. Eub was notable, but only in name....he was at the very least, compromised and headed toward the end. PS- I don't much care for defending Hopkins resume, but it should be applied evenly.
what a surprise, you cowardly ducked debating boxing with me despite your cringeworth crying in this thread. you know that you will never ever come out on top against me. keep giving yourself license to run, but if you happen to take a full bottle of courage pills one night and fancy your chances, don't hesitate to jump into the debate i'm in, but make sure your man enough to leave your alter-ego's and cut and pastes out of the thread. btw, good luck with your dick sucking degree at university you scottish dweeb I'm sure you will pass it with flying colours :rofl
thats common knowledge popkins is dinamita / kittikasem / roskolnikov. there are also a number of other accounts that are highly suspicious on here aswell, but i will wait for 100% proof before naming them. thats how fragile this little scottish cocksucker is, he creates all these alter-ego's to try and support himself in debate :rofl