calzaghe no 1 p4p if manny loses to dlh

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by treva1977, Sep 3, 2008.


  1. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    if manny loses to dlh as expected,does that put calzaghe no 1 p4p on beating rjj.i think it should. your thoughts gentlemen please?
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
  3. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    No. I don't see why. LOsing to a LMW should not move you down.
     
  4. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    ANd, as you said it...Manny expected to lose...
    but also...Calzaghe expected to win.
    Why should they trade p4p place then?
     
  5. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    if he is willing to take a fight too big for him he should be willing to take the crunch that goes with it.every one should agree with that.
     
  6. sam_sunders

    sam_sunders science Full Member

    2,099
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    hah - right. 71% KO is no slapper buddy!
    and he avoids nobody. you'll see.
     
  7. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    Sorry, i don't. P4P ranking is no way related to not being able to beat a guy fighting 3 weight classes over yours.
     
  8. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    I respect Calzaghe, believe me. BUt yes, i think he slaps. In this 71%, how many are like the Manfredo's ko?
     
  9. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    No.

    If Joe doesn't totally outclass Winchester Jones though he may well move down to 3 in the rankings. JMM is knocking on the door.
     
  10. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    So you want to reward someone for taking on a totally and utterly shot fighter - and sidestepping the obvious challenge?
     
  11. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    and who to go no2 if this happens.i think calz should be no1 now.no loses,and a better fighter that manny imo.
     
  12. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    No losses means little in my mind.
     
  13. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    what about being champ for over ten years. i suppose that means little too.
     
  14. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    No. You can't hold a loss at welterweight against Pacquiao. Besides, provided he beats Casamayor, wouldn't JMM be next in line?!
     
  15. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    lol.there heavy weights .thats is expected.