calzaghe no 1 p4p if manny loses to dlh

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by treva1977, Sep 3, 2008.


  1. brown_bomber

    brown_bomber BROWN BOMBER Full Member

    2,973
    0
    Apr 26, 2006
    dumbest stoppage ever :nut
     
  2. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Joe wouldnt have done anything in 2008 to move him up.

    Loosing to ODLH itself wont have an effect on Pac's p4p status, not winning a fight for the rest of the year when other fighters could be winning their fights would affect it though. However in this case, Joe wont be doing anything worthwile the rest of 2008 either.
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I still would have Pac at 1 regardless of loosing.... Oscar is just too big, this fight doesn't mean a thing if Pac looses. But if Pac wins........
     
  4. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Pac losing to DLH should not drop him, sorry.

    It's like Calzaghe losing to Wlad Klitschko, I wouldn't drop him either.
     
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,483
    11,530
    Jan 6, 2007
    I already rank Calzaghe ahead of Pac (I'm a fan of both).


    BUT, I don't believe a loss to DLH should lower Manny's standing.


    If I had Pac at #1 before that fight, I would not drop him down the list because of that loss.
     
  6. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    if pac did not fight for the remaining of the year and wait for next year to fight at lightweight, i doubt anyone would put calzaghe as #1 in beating the shot rjj (except maybe TFFP and CHJ). i consider this as an exhibition fight for pac so it neither moves him up nor down the p4p standings.
     
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,483
    11,530
    Jan 6, 2007
    Agreed.
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Well that's more real and logical . . . if JMM beats Casa for the ring belt . . . Calzaghe should move down to #3. :deal
     
  9. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    i think you have to live in the real world of boxing before you bigup your local hero.

    i know advertising clouds people's point of view and you can find 500k screaming welshmen to back you up - but its not going to happen.
     
  10. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    You ever hear of this kid Kelly Pavlik? I know Joe forgot about him after calling him out.:lol:
     
  11. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    [url]http://www.boxrec.com/[/url]

    1 [url]Kelly Pavlik[/url][url] middleweight[/url]
    2 [url]Joe Calzaghe[/url][url]light heavyweight[/url]
    3 [url]Manny Pacquiao[/url][url] lightweight[/url]
    4 [url]Bernard Hopkins [/url][url]light heavyweight[/url]

    How does Manny losing bump Joe above Kelly?:huh
     
  12. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    as soon as he stuck with warren he avoided people.

    why do you think hatton left warren?
     
  13. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    :lol:

    Anyway, No. I wouldn't bump Calzaghe to #1. Pac remains at #1 regardless of whether he loses or not.
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    :D :lol: :D :good

    if he losses to somebody on his weight category by all means he can be replaced!
     
  15. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    Perhaps.

    Manny has already lost several times, Joe has never lost. I think Joe would have a relatively good case.