Calzaghe Only Faced Bums In His WBO Title Reign? THE PROPER BREAKDOWN.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Sep 24, 2008.


  1. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    It's called using Logic(you actually just did that) and if you convince yourself a lie, you'll believe it even it isn't true.(something he always does in all posts) He also doesn't think for hisself, he listens to what someone else says, usually by what someone writes or a so called experts says. I don't even know why you guys even argue with this dude, I would of been stopped.
     
  2. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    I have this rumour and I would love to see the proof. Not as much as I would like to see the Vid of Vitali supposedly getting KTFO by Pele Reid in the amateurs.
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    3 sources claiming Calzaghe beat Byrd as an amateur :lol:.
    If it didnt happen, it didnt happen, but find the source and show me if you can. I do understand, and so not to get you guys all upset, we can just forget the subject because you cant put forward a sensible debate or source against me on the subject. I have read things or seen things and havent had a source, and without one, nobody believes you. But to me with so many things I have read, I have no reason to disbelieve that Calzaghe beat Byrd as an amateur
     
  4. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    Wiki is not a source anyone can edit that

    A boxing forum is not a source, none of these show any proof of this fight.

    Why would there be a source for somethign that did not happen?

    Is chris Byrd not a credible enough source ?
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Read what I wrote

    "I have read things or seen things and havent had a source, and without one, nobody believes you. But to me with so many things I have read, I have no reason to disbelieve that Calzaghe beat Byrd as an amateur"

    It might not have happend,
    This content is protected
    , which has never been the case. It is something that has been said and read, where people have no reason to disbelieve it, even saying the event. The other details mentioned
    This content is protected
    are also accurate, as Calzaghe did beat D Francis, G Catley, J Matthews etc.

    Now. If you say it didnt gappen etc, then lets not debate on that subject. I have no reason to believe you are lying, but I also have no reason to believe any of the details of the 3 links are untrue either. Get it
     
  6. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACgTJhEdj5M[/ame]


    Another indication Calzaghe only fought bums.

    Calzaghe was so used to dealing with bums, that was exactly what he was going for when he started having homo fantasies in the ring vs Hopkins.

    Why didnt BHop never attempted that **** over here.
    This content is protected
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    Totally agree. Bailey won't budge no matter what evidence you present. He isn't here to debate, he's here to correct "all the wrong Americans" with his so called vast knowledge. He bitches about Americans hyping American fighters, yet he hypes American fighters when it suits him. He's nothin but a troll...
     
  8. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Stalker, you still writing about me, sounds like yiou think you know me now :lol:. Read the bottom post that was posted before you wrote you last sad peice.
    Producing 3 sources isnt trolling even if some are sites that can be altered. Just the normal case of me schooling you

    3 Sources
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: You're a troll, everyone sees that. You try to act like you're here to debate, buty your not. You're just here to tell everyone they are wrong, and you are right. YAWN...we get it...punks like you come and go ALL the time.

    If you had ANY brains, you'd see your so called sources, are ****. And if they were used against you, you;d be saying the same thing.

    But you use things that suit you, it's your MO. No cred, total hypocrite, silly twat...
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    You have proven yourself to a right **** with your last quote. Read below. It openly says that I am happy to let the subject go. Truth is you have read that, but was just looking for another reason to quote anything I write :lol:. Stalker

     
  12. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Yes, but why did it take so long to unify? 8+ years?
     
  13. Drinker

    Drinker Guest

    Who knows? But maybe, just maybe, the other champions were not so keen on fighting Joe.

    The fact that he did unify against dangerous undefeated champions says it all.

    To me it's impressive that Joe held on to his title for so long and unified when he did. He didn't become a champion, have a few defences, lose and then fade away like so many do. I consisder that special.
     
  14. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    calzaghe had a nemesis in hopkins. instead he ran into retirement and started snorting coke because that's what frauds do.
     
  15. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    THANK YOU!!!!!!! too bad bailey can't keep calzaghe's dick out of his mouth long enough separate fiction from reality.