Calzaghe Only Faced Bums In His WBO Title Reign? THE PROPER BREAKDOWN.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Sep 24, 2008.


  1. karl2007

    karl2007 New Member Full Member

    70
    0
    Dec 7, 2010
    i dont think joe saw big fight big money big names and fame and stardom and went the other way what top american would fancy fighting a relativly unknown fighter with the skill and awarkness of joe for low reward im talking about early carreer not after lacy


    joe calzaghe dodged fighter some opposition was mediocre but whos isnt at times lacy had balls and look what happened to him he got made to look like a novice and he was a world champ ha ha i agree he could have achieved more 5years earlier or later but you fight whos put in front of you manfredo was a joke tho bika is tough reid and woodhall were no mugs and eubank was one tough nut
     
  2. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008

    Hopkins fought these non top 10 ranked fighters:-
    Steve Frank
    William Bo James
    Glen Johnson
    Andrew Council
    Simon Brown
    Morrade Hakkar

    Calzaghe fought these non top 10 ranked fighters
    Branko Sobot
    Ferreya
    Rick Thornberry
    David Starie
    Omar Sheika
    Mario Veit
    Will McIntyre
    Miguel Angel Jiminez
    Tocker Pudwill
    Mger Mkrtchyan
    Kabery Salem
    Mario Veit II
    Evans Ashira (althought top to MW at one point)

    Calzaghe fought 13 non top 10 ranked opponents, while Hopkins only fought 6, 1 of them was an ex LMW champ (brown) and one of them was a future LHW champ (Johnson)

    Hopkins fought more top 10 ranked opposition, and less non top 10 ranked opposition as proven.
     
  3. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    2003

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    Hopkins 31 - 20 Calzaghe

    2004

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    Hopkins 38 - 23 Calzaghe

    2005

    Title Vacant...............
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    Hopkins 42 - 26 Calzaghe

    2006/1996

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    ..........Robert McCracken

    Hopkins 45 - 29 Calzaghe

    2007

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    Hopkins 45 - 32 Calzaghe



    :deal
     
  4. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008


    Well all I am saying is, it would be more healthy for Calzaghe legacy if he went out and fought Pavlik instead.



    It was a last day pay day, and Calzaghe deserves to get paid after his services to the game, but what I think is he realised his time is coming to an end, and instead of losing that "0", quit while you are ahead and thats it.



    Hopkins did call him out of retirement, so did Froch, but both realised Calzaghe is done, especially after the cocaine incident, so laid off.
     
  5. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Who the hell are you another lame Bailey alt? Nothing you say will change the fact that Calzaghe was a champion in name only for the bulk of his career. Nothing you say will change the fact that 168 is not a prestigious division and was a weak division during 98% Joe's career. Nothing can change the fact that Joe's time at the top was short and his solid victories are very few in number.
     
  6. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    You guys aren't still arguing with this 14 year old imbecile??
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest


    Realsoulja has shut this argument down. Irrefutably. :deal
     
  8. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Calzaghe's had better wins at the top level.
    Calzaghe beat Hopkins head to head.
    Those are the facts, realsoulja is trying to point out that Hopkins beat more second tier boxers, which has little bearing on ATG status, top performers should beat second tier boxers all the time, what counts is when ATG status boxers fight top level performers, and Roy Jones, Taylor and Calzaghe say that Hopkins is average at the very highest level, at the highest level Calzaghe beat Hopkins.
     
  9. swayz

    swayz Guest

    no i didn't. notany more than you said calzaghe should have faced liles. i'll tell you what tho...b-hop/sturm was far more viable than calzaghe/liles.

    excuse: "To explain (a fault or an offense) in the hope of being forgiven or understood", "To serve as justification for".

    you said b-hop had no rivals he didn't beat. i pointed out he did & prove it. you say something else. blah blah blah.

    imo the ring top ten is about hyping fights in the us for us tv. i don't give a **** about them. mention them in passing to illustrate a contemporary view = fine. base whole arguments on them = dumb.

    touche. :lol:

    seriously tho. warren may be a ***** but sauerland are among the most corrupt in a sport known for corruption. there really is no comparison.

    dude...calzaghe may have not faced the best opposition during his career...he had long periods of inactivity & for whatever reason didn't get the really big fights until late on...but ottke is a ****ing punchline. his career was disgracefully manufactured. again...there is no comparison.

    no. i'd be interested to see how you came up with that.

    you reckon? the main point of the story is that a lot of people say "calzaghe stayed at home ducking americans & waited until b-hop was old" when the reason the fight didn't get made was b-hop pussying out on a big payday fighting joe to make peanuts fighting hakkar.

    er harry simon was actually pretty good...a real wasted talent. the reason he wasn't fighting was not exactly boxing related. he is certainly not worthy of a laughter emoticon. altho i don't criticise b-hop for not fighting him, obviously...well no more than i criticise calzaghe for not fighting liles :lol:. just pointing out a "rival" at 160 b-hop never faced.

    all were ranked in the top 3 of your beloved ring rankings. b-hop faced none of them. you did ask me to name ONE top 3 ranked middleweight that b-hop didn't fight. i named 4. :deal

    that is all. :lol:

    yes a resume can only be improved if you beat the man who was destroyed in 3 rds by the man you beat. :patsch

    yeah...except: after turning down £3m to fight calzaghe he instead took on hakkar for peanuts. :patsch

    yeah...b-hop would NEVER face a shot rjj would he?

    in fact...b-hop faced an even more shot rjj....didn't even get a lot of money for doing it...& looked far far worse against him than calzaghe did; acting like a total ***** for the whole fight. what a warrior.

    in the midst of all that praise for hopkins...you bring up dawson (who when calzaghe retired was only beginning to make a name for himself & had been very lucky getting a decision against glen johnson) & present him as being ducked by calzaghe for being "too risky for his 0"...when the guy you are praising as a warrior has been ducking him for 4 years? :lol:

    whatever, man...whatever.
     
  10. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    There is no comparison because there wasn't the robbery shennanigans and such. And although I have been critical of the refereeing in Calzaghes fights, the is no comparison there either. Calzaghe also stepped it before he retired. There will always be some comparison though because both fighters and those around them seemed hell bent on protecting the 0. Protecting the 0 is a great marketing tool to the hometown fans, but from a legacy standpoint, not so much. This gives both guys career the appearance of being manufactured, although to a different extent in Ottkes case.
     
  11. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    I think we more or less coming towards the end of this discussion, I learnt quite a bit over these exchanges to be honest I respect you for that, you like a way more eductated version of bailey. But a few points I did disagree with regarding your last post:-

    Amongst those "rivals" for Hopkins that people may think are:-

    Felix Sturm, and thats it. If you think Harry Simon and Hacine Cherifi are amongst them thats bull**** since they were not champions for long periods, nor were they standing in the way of Hopkins becomin recognised man of the division. Sturm IMO also doesnt fit that description.

    Yes Sauderland is definatly worse. IMO Ricky Hatton and Amir Khan did better when they left Warren who hindered Calzaghe's legacy by making some shitty defenses in the UK.

    Agree there is absolutley no comparison, Ottke shouldnt even be undefeated, Charles Brewer, Thomas Tate, Glen Johnson, Byron Mitchell, Mads Larsen and Robin Reid to name a few dodgy decisions. My point was Ottke was a man that would have given Calzaghe the main man position alot quicker.

    This rival which Calzaghe didnt fight is a bigger rival than any which BHop had. Bigger than Cherifi and Sturm.

    Hopkins pussied out then called him out after the Wright fight? Come on man. Hopkins was changing from Don King to GoldenBoy around the same time. You say he made peanuts, he eventually got paid fighting ODLH 2 fights later regardless.

    They were not even in the same weight class.

    When they were in the same weight class, they fought to a SD, Hopkins called out Calzaghe for a rematch after the Pavlik fight, Calzaghe declined.

    He wasnt a rival of Hopkins, he won the WBO in 2002 and didnt fight again until 2007.

    Lets cut the bull****, do you really think, Felix Sturm, Hacine Cherifi, Rodney Jones and Harry Simon were rivals of Hopkins?

    I think Ottke and Beyer were definatle, aswell as Lacy and Kessler.

    It would have been better dominance thats the point I am making. It would have been a better fight than Manfredo, Bika, Ashira, Kabery Salem.....

    If you want to talk about money, Hopkins made $1.125 Million vs Hakkar, and then 2 fights later made $10 - $15 Million vs Oscar De La Hoya. Turning down that 3 mill and made 5 times more the amount. 1.125 mil aint peanuts.

    Also that was a don king negotiation, Sauderland was a corrupt one, Warren is a cautious one, but King is one ****er that aint going to pay you the right money. Trinidad, Mayorga and Tyson still asking for their wages.

    1) Hopkins didnt retire the fight after
    2) It was a non title fight
    3) Hopkins was fighting Enrique Orrnelous the fight before
    4) Hopkins and Jones had a long history
    5) Business
    6) Hopkins got hit on the back of his head vs RJJ, which was a minor slap and just took the ****, he got hit hard by Pascal but since it was ruled a knockdown he didnt take the ****. You think Hopkins was in pain? come on man he been taking the **** all his career. Watch the two Echols fights, some entertaining oscar winning drama **** there, Hopkins supposedly dislocates his right shoulder after being body slammed, then a few rounds later Knocks Echols out with the injured arm:lol: Echols II fight that is. And then the Calzaghe fight round 10 fake low blow, aswell as the Robert Allen fight. Hopkins is smart knows his limits and has used the opportunities well to get the upper hand in fights.

    Calzaghe had Hopkins gassed out hard, but after Hopkins had a nice long break from faking the KO, Calzaghe was back in trouble like he was in Round 1. Thats smart ****.

    Hopkins can do what he wants now at this age his legacy aint going to decrease, he can fight Enrique Orrnelous II if he wants to stay active. Him saying he wants to become the oldest man to win a title and attempting it nullifies all that RJJ II and Enrique fights. Calzaghe didnt nullify his fight with shot Jones Jr rather he retired on it and probably realised its the end of the road getting Knocked down against a shot jones is embarresing as it gets.

    Hopkins "excuse" is that he dont want to destroy him :lol: saying he would do another Pavlik. I think he knows his limits and knows at his age and condition Dawson has some tools that disrupt him but after recent events, Pascal vs Dawson and Pascal vs Hopkins, I begining to think Hopkins can outsmart Dawson

    Hopkins is cherry picking at the moment, but atleast his cherry picking is better than Cocaine picking. I got more respect for Hopkins fight Pascal, who regardless is tough, than Calzaghe who left the game all together once he finally got the recognition he deserved.
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Hey ****, is that your best contribution :lol:
    I was doing you a favour, as you are losing credit and your debate. Guess you havent learnt anything yet :patsch
     
  13. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    cool bailey man, its all good.
     
  14. swayz

    swayz Guest

    i actually said i don't consider b-hop's resume weakened by their absence from it. but:

    ok. i respect that.


    i would argue that sturm/hopkins would have been a bigger fight than calzaghe/ottke...but whatever...like i said i don't think b-hop's record would be improved by beating sturm anyway.

    that was a couple of years later.

    excuses? the fight was on...b-hop didn't want it for whatever reason. doesn't matter anyway...just showing it wasn't always calzaghe/warren's fault that the big fights that would have defined him earlier didn't come off...if he's actively chasing b-hop...it's a bit hard to believe he was ducking beyer.

    less than he would have got facing calzaghe? to face a less dangerous and less respected opponent? ok. great deal.

    it was a don king negotiation...cos don king was promoting hopkins. :patsch
    just like he was when hopkins faced hakkar. are we blaming calzaghe for hopkins choice of promoter?


    excuses :lol:

    calzaghe gets slated for fighting rjj coming off 3 wins & ranked 6 in the ring rankings...but b-hop gets a free pass for fighting rjj coming off a rd 1 ko?:-(


    that was what i called "acting like a *****" but you can call it "smart ****" if you want. i won't argue.

    calzaghe knew he was done. his hands were ****ed, his punch resistance was going, his speed was going & he clearly found it hard to motivate himself for fights towards the end of his career. he retired at the right time for him.
     
  15. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Yet again I think you are right swayz, I must admit you have done some very fair posts today, Calzaghe was terrible against Hopkins, having followed Calzaghe's career closely, I thought that the Hopkins fight was the worst big fight performance of his career and that is taking into consideration how streetwise Hopkins is, after the fight a local tv station in Wales was in the small front room of Calzaghe's sisters house {a family member anyway} and they were interviewing family members that had all been huddled round the tv watching the fight, Calzaghe's sister had just come off the phone to Joe and the tv people wanted to know what was said, she only wanted to know that he was ok and not hurt, the tv people said was Joe pleased he won and she said, he was disappointed with his performance, which was my take on it as well, that is why I am convinced that Calzaghe beats Hopkins at any point in their careers, if Hopkins could not beat him on that night he would never beat him.

    I never heard stories of him missing training in his career, he used to train hard but not spar much in the latter part of his career due to his hands, yet his father had to give him a row before the Hopkins fight his motivation was going, he was publically talking about retirement , which is very bad for a boxer still active, his hands were gone as we know but his punch resistance as you say was also going, Calzaghe had always had an excellent chin, not good but excellent, because of his attacking style, throwing twenty punches without drawing breath on occasion then obviously he would leave himself open to counters, yet he only went down twice in his career prior to his last two fights, the Hopkins flash knockdown was just that, and its hard to say how hard he was hit but I have seen him take loads of similar punches over his career and barely move, the Jones one was a fluke he ducked into a forearm smash and that could have been that but he somehow got up and carried on.

    I also think he retired at the right time, obviously a great champion with Calzaghe's determination and nous could have won another big fight if he could have got motivated and his hands had had time to heal, but the time was right, his father that had been with him every step of the way knew it and I think told him so, when there was talk of a comeback I saw a quote from his father saying he can find another trainer and cornerman he has had his time and he should stay retired.
    Its not many boxers that retire at the right time but I think Calzaghe did.