Calzaghe resume = Hopkins resume?

Calzaghe would easily beat Johnson, Tarver, Winky, Tito & DLH.

Oh and Calzaghe already beat Hopkins.

Enuff said.

 

There resumes are not that far apart to be fair, obviously people will deny that but its true.

 

This is an insult to Hopkins, possibly the biggest insult ANY sane human being let alone real BOXING fan would make, you must be ******ed or just trolling on purpose, even Boxrec all alone should convince you otherwise without having to make "serious" use of your dial-up connection.

Hopkins DIDN'T wait for other belt holders to make the flight to him nor literally beg to make these fights happen when he dominated middleweight. Hopkins fought each champion and unified from scratch, all the meaningful belts and also defended them, WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO. Hopkins also moved up to light heavyweight and won the lineal title there as well fighting guys he WASN'T supposed to beat and was a heavy underdog fighting them because of his age.

It didn't make sense to Calzaghe to travel when everyone was young and prime because he, an admitted unknown, thought he deserved insane amounts of money but it made sense when they were all past it for two fights only then a "glorious" retirement no one gave a **** to celebrate or announce.

Hopkins shits on Calzaghe top to bottom when it comes to resume and accomplishments. To be honest, Andre Ward, who is new can compete with Calzaghe in terms of resume. Make sure to look at the ******s who claim it's 50/50's location right below their avatars. If it's England or anywhere close to that then immediately scroll down. These guys would also argue that Pacquiao and Hatton's resumes are 50/50 or 51%/49% slightly in favor of Hatton.

 

shame Hopkins refused to fight Calzaghe in 2001:smoke

 

That's the only thing you guys can make a case of and you're making it seem like Calzaghe has been officially announced the greatest of all generations and Hopkins and a mass murderer and cheater. You can list that one fight for Hopkins, want me to list you the long list of possible opponents Calzaghe could have considered or moved up to fight if he really wanted to when they weren't as shot as he waited for them to be?

 

are you forgetting that JC beat hopkins ?

therefiore yours should read


Bhops best wins:
Tito
Oscar
Joppy
Holmes

Noticable losses:
Jones
Taylor*2
Calzaghe

Calzaghe:
Hopkins
Lacy
Eubank
Kessler
Reid

 

thats a rediculous statement to make, i dont know anyone who would think that... its just pathetic even saying it, not all english fans are stupid ya know... calzaghes f*kin welsh anyways

 

Good point.....acually B-Hops record while Middleweight champ was less than Calzage as a Super M....It was as an older more experienced and less drained fighter in the lightheavyweight division did B-Hop peak IMO and he had good wins over Tarver and Pavlick

Overall there records are about equal or Calzage may have the edge

 

Wins over

Winky (A+ fighter at his best) B fighter when he fought Bernard
Pavlik (B+ fighter looked to be A at the time)
Tarver (A fighter)
Johnson (B+ fighter)
Trinidad (A+ fighter, Hopkins ruined him)
Joppy (C fighter)
Oscar Delahoya (A+ fighter, granted too small for Bernard.)

and soon Roy Jones (If calzhage can claim it over a shot Roy so can Hopkins) crushes Calzhages resume

Of

Kessler (Overrated can't adapt) B- fighter
Lacy (Trash) C - fighter
Jones (Shot) Former A+ (C- when he fought Joe)
And Hopkins (Good win) A- fighter