Calzaghe resume > Jones?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Nov 3, 2008.


  1. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,302
    Jan 4, 2005
    Id rate JC's win over past prime Eubank better than a shot RJJ or a solid Kessler.
     
  2. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,351
    3
    Nov 4, 2007
    No.
     
  3. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Well Since you wanna put guys like Bika and Ashira and Veit on Calzaghe's resume I'll list them as such.

    Calzaghe:

    Eubank
    Reid
    Woodhall
    Sheika
    Veit (twice)
    Brewer Mitchell
    Ashira
    Lacy
    Bika
    Manfredo
    Kessler
    Hopkins

    Jones:

    Vaca
    Castro
    Wolfe
    Hopkins
    Malinga
    Tate
    Toney
    Pazienza
    Thornton
    Lucas
    Brannon
    McCallum
    Griffin
    Hill
    Del Valle
    Grant
    Johnson
    Hall
    Harding
    Gonzalez
    Kelly
    Woods
    Ruiz
    Tarver
    Handshaw
    Trinidad

    Even if Calzaqghe beats Joe, Jones' resume pwned Calzaghe's.
     
  4. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Stinky Gloves has always been a Jones hater and worthless poster. He's not worth this many responses.
     
  5. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Are you kidding? Not even close.
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not even close.... RJJ's resume is much better then Calzaghe's...
     
  7. sonny73

    sonny73 Active Member Full Member

    958
    0
    Feb 27, 2006
    haha alot of Americans are breaking out in a cold sweat with the thought of Calzaghe being higher regarded in terms of his legacy than Jones.People forget you have to include Jones loses aswel.In terms of Career Calzaghes is very very close to Jones,in terms of who is the best fighter at their peak,probably Jones but not as much in it as most poeple here think.
     
  8. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    230
    Jun 2, 2007
    I really don't think it's close when talking about who was better at their peaks. Clearly it is Jones.
     
  9. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    I agree, and Toney did not look his best in that fight...RJJs' resume aint any more to bragg on than Joes',,,,,but that does not take away the fact that they are both tops...in both their days as well
     
  10. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    I dunno...being a fan of both. I'd bet Joe at anytime at 168..but 175---Roy could win
     
  11. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    :good
     
  12. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    He's been good, but so have others...when I heard the commentators say Joe was best at 168...I can well believe them over a bunch of hating biased yahoos on here...and I do
     
  13. sonny73

    sonny73 Active Member Full Member

    958
    0
    Feb 27, 2006
    If your judging in only 1 rd I would agree...tho over 12 or even 15 I think the gap narrows dramatically as Calzaghes chin and Stamina come into play.
     
  14. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    You haters woukdn't give Joe an ounce of credit no matter what he does, so what's he point??
    Joe whomped Lacy better at 168 than ANYONE could have done ( Except RJJ Maybe )'''and Lacy was a nut-fking God on here, and Joe whooped him all 12,,,and STILL no credit given, instead the phony haters overhyped excuse...phooey on you all
     
  15. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    And how many here on this post have always been Calzaghe haters,,,,geeeshh give me a break:twisted: