Calzaghe rules out B-Hop rematch!

As close as that fight was - this was the best you could come up with.

Shoot yourself!

 

Honestly a rematch is not appealing

 

Honestly a rematch is not appealing

 

People wouldn't give Calzaghe credit for beating Hopkins the first time... I sure as hell don't blame him. He gains nothing from beating him again.

 

Grow up.

 

Joe Calzaghe is he king of boxing he wud abuse hopkins in a rematch, hopkins got lucky in there first fight to get what he did! Calzaghe wud school pavlik with both hands tied behind his back

 

Good Riddance to a padded carrer. Besides Kessler, an old Eubank, and Hopkins he fought no one of note. Sorry prime Robin Reid does not count. He had the skill, too bad he didn't try to build his resmue up. He doesn't give rematches yet he gave Veit a rematch.

 

Regardless to what or who you are - that was one of the gay-est post I've seen on ESB. :huh

As the older folks would say - if you don't have anything good to say - then Shut the **** up!!!! :fire

If Calzaghe chooses not to fight Hopkins again - then fine. But all that Butt ****ing **** you were talking had nothing to do with the fight or fighting at all. Then you referred to it about 3 times - that's not a little gay - that all the way. :nono

 

Joe aint much younger than Roy, and he has that hand problem to watch out for

 

edit

 

Veit was a mandatory both times.

 

Then don't say you don't give rematches when your record states otherwise. Especially when it is against journeymen.

 

The Calzaghe fans think Hopkins was better at 43 than in his prime I find this extremely odd. After Calzaghe watched that domination of Pavlik he wants no part of Hopkins. Hopkins knows it was one of his last fights that's why he tried so hard.