Calzaghe should prove that he's great

Where did I say this?

 

If you can't understand what I'm saying here, just say so and I'll add you to my list

 

where are you pulling your 'if' from in the highlights?

and there's a good reason why you're getting petty replying to me.

just answer the posts. emotes arent going to bloster your online persona.

 

You mean this post, where you completely ****ed up and accused me of posting something I didn't?

Why would I start arguing a point I never made yet you claim I did when I've proven in my previous post I didn't?

Are you on drugs? :nut

Updated list:

TooPurdy
spam raFail
Semen Flow
Can I Bust 82
BBC Commentator
BADRETENTION2

 

thats what i thought.

you cant answer what i put infront of you.

 

There are so many experts on here who are so dead sure of who would beat who and how they'd do it! If you can look into the past and predict hypothetical outcomes so easily, you all must be making a fortune with the bookies!

 

now you know why you're a ***** in real life.

you have to be petty and think you get 'rep pointsø from this otherwise.

you've never been a fighter in your life and your just a local boy trying to big up his fighter.

thats to irn bru man - i hate baby **** posters like that.

 

:rofl

What exactly was put in front of me?

I refuted claims that RJJ and Hopkins would have beaten Calzaghe in their prime, you started waffling about politics, I said the politics had no say on what the potential outcome of these fights could have been, and you start saying I claimed these politics never prevented these fights from happening

You're trying to blind me with your idiocy but you're just spinning your wheels and seizing on something that doesn't exist.

You still haven't answered my question - did you see the Hopkins vs Calzaghe fight, and did you have Hopkins winning?

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl

How could someone be as dumb as you?

 

just be a coward in real life. thats who you are.

thats my last post to you.

 

Yo man, relax. This is just some talking going on in here. It ain't that important.

 

Seriously BADINTENTIONS:

I know you believe Frank Warren prevented the Calzaghe-Jones and Calzageh-Hopkins fights from happeneing when Jones and Hopkins were in their primes.

But where does that fit in with my statement that Frank Warrens' politics have no impact on what the actual outcome of those fights would have been had they happened?

Also, if Frank Warren was preventing these fights from happening, why did Hopkin's price himself out at the last minute? Because Calzaghe was high risk low reward?

Don't you undertsand that means Hopkins and/or his manager at the time believed Calzaghe was capable of beating Hopkins?

 

it is to him