Calzaghe SMW reighn vs. Hopkins MW reighn

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iceferg, Jun 30, 2012.


  1. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    Chris Eubank vs. Segundo Mercado
    Branco Sabot vs. Steve Frank
    Juan Carlos Gimenez vs. Joe Lipsey
    Robin Reid vs. William Bo James
    Rick Thornbury vs. John David Jackson
    David Starie vs. Glen Johnson
    Omar Sheika vs. Andrew Council
    Richie Woodhall vs. Simon Brown
    Mario Veit vs. Robert Allen
    Will McIntyre vs. Robert Allen
    Charles Brewer vs. Antwun Echols
    Miguel Angel Jimenez vs. Syd Vanderpool
    Tocker Pudwill vs. Antwun Echols
    Byron Mitchell vs. Keith Holmes
    Mger Mkrtgyan vs. Felix Trinidad
    Kabary Salam vs. Carl Daniels
    Mario Veit vs. Morrade Hakkar
    Evans Ashira vs. William Joppy
    Jeff Lacy vs. Robert Allen
    Sakio Bika vs. ODLH
    Peter Manfredo Jr vs. Howard Eastman
    Mikkel Kessler


    Former champions underlined. Hopkins had 20 successful defences Calzaghe 21. Hopkins beat 5 champions Calzaghe beat 7. Who had the better run p4p???
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    MW was an established division in the 90s, SMW was embryonic.

    Its like asking whats more established in the 90s, Cruiserweight or Heavyweight?


    But theres gems in any time period, like CW Holyfield. Just fewer in a diluted, vacuum of a division than a bona fide one with a lucrative history. Hopkins and Calzaghe are clearly gems in their divisions.
     
  3. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    Eubank and Kessler gives the edge to Calzaghe . Trinidad and DLH are natural WW's, and Hopkins has losses to Taylor which affect his legacy
     
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    What a stupid argument.
     
  5. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    Kessler is Joe Calzaghe's Jermain Taylor. i.e the young gun coming to take the crown towards the end of his reighn. Difference is Calzaghe beat him unlike Hopkins.

    Have to give Calzaghe the edge for me. Also he beat Hopkins at LHW.
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    which part is stupid?


    precisely and exactly pick the word, please.
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    Kessler is not in Jermaine Taylors league.

    Hopkins was stupid to be facing JT when hes himself at 40 years of age, IMHO, his bravery got the better of him. No one faces that calibre of opponent at 40, and to be reprimanded for losnig at that age to such an opponent, you;ve got ask questions about the bias person raising the reprimand. Noone faults Joe Louis for not being able to stop Rocky Marciano or Ali for not beating Holmes.
     
  8. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    I'm sorry mate but I'm starting to think your a troll. Kessler has beaten someone who has beaten Taylor and imo would beat Taylor but fair enough you can have your opinion.
     
  9. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    Well the question is who fought and beat the better guys. I don't really care which division was "more established" by your definition. That's like saying some complete bum would beat Calzaghe just because he's a middle weight.

    Don't forget Benn, Jones Jr, Eubank, Collins, McLenan, Watson, Toney had all been SMWs before this time so it wasn't exactly a new division.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    see, its interesting you call me the troll, seeing as its your credibility in questioning 40 year old Hopkins ability to beat prime Taylor that had just been raised by me.

    yes, thats a very interesting comeback indeed from you, that is, and its now quoted so that everyone can read and appraise it. cheers.
     
  11. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    What on Earth are you trying to say. That makes no sense what so ever.
     
  12. exodus

    exodus Active Member Full Member

    1,028
    0
    Jun 25, 2012
    Hopkins bested Calzaghe, that alone should answer any question you have regarding the two.
     
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    theres gems in every field, yes.

    but theres thin fields and err, ahem.. thick ones, not to stress the point I already made.
     
  14. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    I'm sorry mate, I can undertand you thinking that as it was a close fight but Calzaghe won for me and he was AT LEAST as past his prime as Hopkins was. Hopkins was to blame for it not having happend earlier as well.
     
  15. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    Well when you look at the "field" Hopkins was playing in, it looks a lotter thinner than it's made out to be doesn't it? Only a few star names on his MW resume and they weren't natural middle weights.