Calzaghe sucked, Froch is better

If he was dat good he would of swerved his belt rather than fight Viet again. garbage mismatch the first time, no need for rematch!

 

What the **** do you mean?? Are you saying that JC wouldn't have beaten Abraham?? It would have been worse than what he gave to Lacey.

 

Calzaghe would beat the **** out of Frochy.

 

Froch is everything that Calzaghe wasn't. Calzaghe is one of the most overrated fighters of all time. A real fraud.

 

If you really believe that,you know very little about boxing

 

I think even as a Froch fan i would say that more times than not calzaghe beats Froch by a small margin if not a small but clear margin.
If they were to fight but..... I think at any point if Froch had him in trouble, and i mean properly in trouble ie first round black american man trouble he would have took him out.

The Kessler that Calzaghe fought was a better version correct, but if that fight was in herning maybe kessler gets the Nod in an SD

Maybe the Froch kessler fights in a neutral venue, for example say the US i think froch would have got the nod. I think the fans were all important in that fight

 

I'm English you clown.

Yeah, beating a shot to **** Roy Jones Jr and getting a debatable decision against a 45 year old Bernard Hopkins while looking like absolute **** and getting put on your ass twice is super impressive. He's an ATG no doubt, the GOAT, Sugar Joe Calzaghe.

 

Calzaghe was knocked down against Mitchell and Salem. Also knocked down against over the hill Hopkins and Jones. He picked his opponents and in my eyes wasn't impressive, Froch fights everybody and does impress........

 

Pardon? :hey

 

:barf:nono

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFhan1S7vv0[/ame]