Calzaghe: The End

Yep, swearing is funny, especially when you put it in capital letters and include smiley faces. Bravo.

 

WHAT?!?!?! Look at Marciano's resume before making such comparisons. Ludicrous. No-one could make the same criticisms of him as they do of Calzaghe. And Pavlik has been a world champion for about 3 hours, no-one is slagging his resume as he hasn't had time (such as 9 years?) to go for the big fights. Nonsense.

 

You pea-brained idiots. OF COURSE I wasn't suggesting those losers were ATGs, I clearly asked 'the stuff an ATGs resume is made of?' - ie do their names make CALZAGHE an ATG, its HIS resume we were talking about, not Charles ****ing Brewer's. Please read carefully before you reply or what is the point.

PS: Re-owned.

 

I removed Mitchell because you highlighted and enlarged Brewer, Woodhall and Reid in the post I was responding to. And I didn't want to make it look like I was just going off on one, I was responding to you. I still don't think Mitchell was world class anyway, but he was the best of that pathetic bunch you have been going on about all day.

I'm not going to bother writing all the same stuff again, we do have different ideas of what world class is, thats all. To me, the very idea that amateur career matters when discussing if a guy was a world class pro or not is laughable. To me, the idea that holding 1 version of a world title for ONE YEAR makes you world class is laughable. To me, the idea that Charles Brewer 40-11, KO'd by several nobodies, 6 losses on his record and aged 33 when he fought Joe, was ever world class is insane. Same for a guy who won a title against a 43 year old with a 42-10 record and lost it a year later. That's not world class. Same for a guy who held a title for a year and lost it, and never got there again (and had also lost to that 40+ superstar Malinga). That's just not my idea of world class at all.

 

If you're going to start with the foul insults, at least make them remotely funny.

overwhelming incontravertable evidence - you are a joke.

 

I'm not going to have another little spat with you Mr E, clearly you enjoy namecalling etc so much you want more. I believe this matter has already been resolved. Please re-read:

I'm not going to bother writing all the same stuff again, we do have different ideas of what world class is, thats all. To me, the very idea that amateur career matters when discussing if a guy was a world class pro or not is laughable. To me, the idea that holding 1 version of a world title for ONE YEAR makes you world class is laughable. To me, the idea that Charles Brewer 40-11, KO'd by several nobodies, 6 losses on his record and aged 33 when he fought Joe, was ever world class is insane. Same for a guy who won a title against a 43 year old with a 42-10 record and lost it a year later. That's not world class. Same for a guy who held a title for a year and lost it, and never got there again (and had also lost to that 40+ superstar Malinga). That's just not my idea of world class at all.

 

My shift is finished here, won't be on til later or tomorrow. I am looking forward to telling my friends how I was arguing today with a guy who thinks Charles Brewer is a world class boxer, it will amuse them no end. It surprises me that someone who knows so little about boxing actually bothers coming on to a boxing forum. You my friend, are violently ******ed. Goodnight.