Calzaghe The Greatest Fighter Of The Last 25 Years!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilist64, Jul 26, 2008.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    YOU HAVENT SEEN TONY WHEN HE WAS AT 168 AND 175..EVEN CRUISER...AS A HW HE HAS MANY FLAWS..BUT ID RATE HIM HIGHER THAN JOE CHALZAGHE...TONY WAS 1 OF THE BEST IN THE 90S...
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    YOU REALLY BELIEVE YOURSELF HUH..HAHA...AND HAGLER FROM 1983 UP TILL HIS LOSS WAS STILL HIMSELF..HE KOD A 40-1 HEARNS..

    PLEASE DONT COMPARE JOE C TO SUGAR RAY LEONARD AT ALL..THATS AN INSULT AND THE 2 NAMES SHOULDNT BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME SENTENCE

    HEARNS HEAD TO HEAD WOULD BEAT THE CRAP OUTTA JOE AT ANY WEIGHT....

    FLOYD..LOL FLOYD LB FOR LB IS ON ANOTHER LEVEL THAN JOE...WHY WAS JOE NEVER RANKED NEAR FLOYD WHEN FLOYD WAS ON TOP...

    RJJ IN HIS PRIME WOULD BEAT JOE WITH EASE

    JAMES TONY WOULD OUTBOX HIM

    SO ALL IN ALL UR BOY AINT TOP 10 EVEN IN THE LAST 25 YEARS

    O AND SUGAR SHANE...ARGUABLY THE BEST LIGHTWEIGHT EVER...

    PERNELL WHITAKER ANYONE

    JOE ISNT THAT GREAT..HES A GOOD FIGHTER BUT HES MOS DEF NOT GREAT...
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    This is lunacy.

    What is the value of this? What is the purpose of it?

    It's fine to debate who you think would win a specific fight, but WTF is the value or purpose of creating an imaginary resume for someone? What can it mean, other than a criticism of the subject for not fighting the guys on the fictional resume?

    Truly the WORST point I have ever read on here.
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    And Last Thing..u Said LEWIS Not As Consistent As Joe...he Was Very Consistent...everyone He Stepped Into The Ring With He Beat....lewis Is Above Joe...
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Superb point amigo- and I don't mean just in this instance, it's good whenever anyone uses compubox's utterly meaningless stats to discredit someone who is tossing them around like concrete proof of anything. If only people would watch fights, score them themselves, and form opinions on how/why one guy won a fight, instead of statistics. Bravo JonOli, for putting this sorry sorry excuse for a boxing fan in his place (as has now been done to him for at least the 5,000th time in this thread alone) :lol:
     
  6. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007

    Regarding consistency and Lennox:

    Oliver and Haseem.
     
  7. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    YEA AND...HE REMATCHED BOTH AND WON BOTH....NOT EVERYONE RETIRES PERFECT UNDEFEATED...AND HARDLY ANYONE WHO STEPS IN THE RING BEATS EVERYONE THEY EVER STEPPED INTO THE RING WITH
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :happy

    Well said. The amount of times I get abuse for being a Filippino as my name is proof I like Pacquiao, or for being American when I say I think Hopkins was better than Calzaghe, when really I'm from Scotland and have no ties to any fighter, I just call it like I see it- I care more about boxing than any boxer, so nationalist or petty rivalries mean nothing to me. Good on you for helping the ESB battle against prejudice
     
  9. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Face It Man Joe Isnt The Greatest Fighter Of The Last 25 Years...hes Good But Hes Not Great...beat Roy And Than Put Him Up There But Till Than Hes Not What You Say He Is...
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Is that a joke??

    How the **** would beating up a 40-year-old guy who hasn't beaten a top 10 ranked light-heavyweight for 4 years, and got sparked out twice in his last 3 fights against decent opposition, how the hell would that put him "up there" as one of the greatest fighters of the last 25 years? What possible bearing could winning this sorry money-making farce of a fight have on his all-time status?

    This thread is getting sordid now, it was bad enough when it was just 1 imbecile making idiotic and unfounded claims about Calzaghe, but now its getting beyond a joke.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007

    I don't think you are getting the point, here.

    I'm not saying it's a perfect concept, but it's a good starting point for something new, and CHJ thought it up. He should be given a little more credit as he is a very serious poster with a lot of posts.

    I'm sure, when the time is right, he will publish the rest of it. He has probably given it a lot of thought, especially in regard to how you score CLOSE hypotheticals.

    Be patient. Some day the presumed resume will be up there as part of HBO's tale of the tape, for both boxers, before every major fight.
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007
    All very true.

    But that's what CONSISTENCY is all about.

    look it up.


    Joe has !

    That's consistency.
     
  13. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Actually think about what you're saying mate, it's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. What in God's name is the point of building an actual resume then, if a fictional resume is even going to contribute to your world/all-time ranking? And if it doesn't contribute to that, then again I ask: what is the value of purpose of it?

    And of course the very obvious reason why it CANNOT ever make sense or be worth writing on a panty-liner is: Boxing history is punctuated with suprises and upsets. In a sport where one lucky punch can end a career or change a fighter's destiny or alter history, HOW can we apply a ridiculous "favourite always wins" rule, and create a fantasy resume for a guy, made up of risks he never took and challenges he never faced??

    I can't actually believe I'm having to explain this to anyone, this is INSANE!!!!!???!! :lol: :patsch :oops: :yikes :-(
     
  14. joecaldragon

    joecaldragon Guest

    I haven't been on here in a couple of days, and I can't believe that my fellow Calzaghe fans are still embarrassing us with this pathetic thread.

    A fake resume part of the future!?! What the **** is that guy smoking!!!!? :rasta :rasta :rasta
     
  15. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    He isn't the greatest of all time resume wise, not quite, but he is the best P4P.

    42 pages and there hasn't been one solid argument against that mate.