Calzaghe The Greatest Fighter Of The Last 25 Years!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilist64, Jul 26, 2008.


  1. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    The assumed resume is a good theory, in essence.

    He's saying he could have beaten all of them, which we know he could. We have to take this into account, it would be foolish not to IMHO.
     
  2. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    My fake resume for Mayweather has a few loses on, like the fight with Cotto he didn't have where he suffered a broken right hand.

    Calzaghe in his assumed resume overcame similar difficulties many times (like against Mormeck). He is simply immune to defeat, he always adapts somehow or the other.

    Perhaps there is a rule - "Joe Calzaghe always wins (unless he is fighting Lennox Lewis or someone who physically outmatches him to a ridiculous extent)"
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Aside from the fact there have already been many many many solid arguments against that point, here is another then, that even if you don't agree with, you must accept as a boxing fan is a perfectly valid and solid argument:

    Sugar Ray Robinson and Sugar Ray Leonard and Roberto Duran to name but three, are all p4p better than Joe Calzaghe because:

    - they each fought more better guys than Calzaghe has ever fought in his career. And I'm not talking about resume, I'm not saying they are better because of the list of names, I am saying that a great boxer proves he is great by great performances against great fighters. Robinson, Leonard and Duran fought more great fighters than Calzaghe did, they fought better in more big fights than he did because they performed brilliantly against brilliant opposition more often.

    Now even if you somehow disagree with these obvious facts, you simply must see that this is a perfectly valid and solid argument??

    As it can easily be substantiated by facts and evidence, it is no empty line.

    Do you take back that there have been no solid arguments? Or do you want to be a petty fanboy child about it??
     
  4. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Sugar Ray Robinson fought in the 40s. This means he can be great, but cannot compare to the actually brilliance of a Joe Calzaghe or Roy Jones, it is evolution. We cannot argue with biology, we are basically a different species these days.
     
  5. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    CHJ,

    Valuev seems to outmatch Joe physically, quite ridiculously infact. How do you see him overcoming the Russian bemoth?
     
  6. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    UR SAYING THE LAST 25 YEARS HES THE BEST LB FOR LB???..
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    "which we know he could"

    WHAT IS THE VALUE OR PURPOSE OF THIS IN BOXING?!??!!?!?!

    If the assumed resume was ever used then we would give guys credits for risks they never took, and that goes against the whole point of the sport!

    If these guys had never fought, then we would have had on the imaginary resume that:

    Tyson would definitely always beat Buster Douglas
    Chavez would definitely always beat Frankie Randall
    Robinson would definitely always beat Randy Turpin
    Louis would definitely always beat Max Schmeling
    Lewis would definitely always beat Hasim Rahman
    Ali would definitely always beat Leon Spinks
    Curry would definitely always beat Lloyd Honeyghan
    and on and on and on..................


    All of these guys would have been credited with wins they didn't get and wins they didn't deserve. It would create a FALSE picture of them and therefore be totally MEANINGLESS.

    Boxing is about 2 men taking the risk of getting in the ring together, where 1 punch can shatter dreams or make a legend.

    If an "assumed" (ie IMAGINARY & FAKE) resume is ever even considered, then the Noble Art has lost the very magic that made it what it is.


    RIDICULOUS. :-(
     
  8. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Calzaghe has superior reaction times. Valuev is oversized to the exent it becomes disadvantagous. With Calzaghe evasiveness, and Valuevs speed, I can't see Calzaghe really being hit.

    Calzaghe would win this fight with jabs to the body, landing hundreds of them. Leaping in and out of range, like a ghost or something. Tiring a little down the stretch perhaps due to the work required.

    120-108 regardless.
     
  9. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    HAHA SORRY..I WAS JUSS TRYING TO GIVE THE WRITER SOME CREDIT TO HIS CLAIM...
     
  10. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    We cannot be certain, but it is quite clear he is the prime contender for that title.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Fair analysis. That's one tick on the assumed resume.

    Mormeck might cause a bit of trouble I feel, he outmatches Joe quite a bit and isn't as slow as Valuev. What with Joe getting a broken hand too, it looks tough. Great win for Calzaghe if he really did come through it.
     
  12. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    This has been covered.

    Floyd Mayweather lost to Cotto due to a broken hand. Assumed resumes include these facts and appreciate no fighter wins for certain due to off days. Apart from Calzaghe which is why he is the best ever in my opinion.

    I hope you can see where I am coming from. Calzaghe is something we might never seen in this sport again, he is truly that good.
     
  13. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    SO BY YOUR CLAIM ONLY PEOPLE WHO RETIRE UNDEFEATED ARE CONSISTENT...I DISAGREE....EVERYONE HAS A BAD NITE SOMETIME OR ANOTHER...LEWIS FOUGHT ANYONE AND EVERYONE.....AND ONCE AGAIN UR THREAD STATES THAT HES THE BEST THE LAST 25 YEARS THAN YOU COME BACK AND SAY HES #5 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
     
  14. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    NO YOUR WRONG...HOW BOUT LENNOX LEWIS..FLOYD..SWEET PEA...RJJ HAVE A MUCH BETTER CASE..MOSLEY AS WELL...JOE IS NOT THE STRONGEST CASE...
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yes, but what you said was:


    He isn't the greatest of all time resume wise, not quite, but he is the best P4P.


    P4P is not H2H. I'm a bit embarrassed for you now to be honest, as you pretty obviously don't know what pound-for-pound means.

    Mate, the whole point of pound-for-pound is that it doesn't matter what era you fought in or what weight divisions you fought in :oops: (get it now?), you are rated on greatness v the opposition you fought and what you achieved in your career.

    You said Calzaghe was best p4p. I said I thought Robinson, Leonard and Duran (there are many many more, but I chose those three for just now) were better. You replied Robinson 'cannot compare to the actual brilliance' of Calzaghe in response to my point.

    OF COURSE he can be compared, the same way as Calzaghe right now is compared to Calderon or Mijares, men he can never fight- it's called pound-for-pound.

    I'm ditching this shortly and sticking to the Classic, this is embarrassing for a boxing fan to sit in a boxing forum and have to explain to people why an imaginary resume doesn't mean anything, or what pound-for-pound means.


    Good night gentlemen. PLEASE for your own sakes go watch some fights, do some reading, and do some thinking before coming back on.